2020
DOI: 10.17818/nm/2020/2.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existing Emission Calculation Methods Applied to Monitoring, Reporting and Verifi cation (MRV) on Board

Abstract: Monitoring, Reporting and Verifi cation (MRV) of emissions on board has been proposed as a measure to reduce global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The requirements for MRV are set by two legislative bodies, the European Union (EU-MRV) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO-DCS) and ships have to comply with them. However, current maritime practices do not permit the right implementation of MRV and best practices can only be developed after a certain time of experience. A solution could be the applic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the modes, relevant to the loads diapason (0.75…0.85)N enom , in all range of gases by-pass changes δ EWG = 0…10 % occur their temperature growth, but even at level δ EWG = 10 % the value t g do not exceed maximum accepted limits, that assure the acceptable level of engine thermal factor. Obtained results are in good agreement with data provided in a number of papers devoted to similar research [49][50][51].…”
Section: Discussion / Raspravasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For the modes, relevant to the loads diapason (0.75…0.85)N enom , in all range of gases by-pass changes δ EWG = 0…10 % occur their temperature growth, but even at level δ EWG = 10 % the value t g do not exceed maximum accepted limits, that assure the acceptable level of engine thermal factor. Obtained results are in good agreement with data provided in a number of papers devoted to similar research [49][50][51].…”
Section: Discussion / Raspravasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Emissions were estimated by the Ship Traffic Emission Assessment Model (STEAM, 2012) algorithm (J.-P. Jalkanen et al, 2009 ; Jalkanen et al, 2012 ; Johansson et al, 2017 ) due to its high accuracy, simplicity and compatibility with AIS data ( Castells-Sanabra et al, 2020 ) compared to other methods ( Coello et al, 2015 ; Goldsworthy and Goldsworthy, 2015 ; Sun et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are extensive and multiperspective ways to assess ship emissions based on methodologies that either combine fuel sales data with emissions (top-down methods) or are based on vessels' technical and operating conditions (bottom-up methods) [8,9]. In this sense, bottom-up approaches are widely used because they are ship specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%