1996
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exon shuffling and the origin of the mitochondrial targeting function in plant cytochrome c1 precursor.

Abstract: Since most of the examples of "exon shuffling" are between vertebrate genes, the view is often expressed that exon shuffling is limited to the evolutionarily recent lineage of vertebrates. Although exon shuffling in plants has been inferred from the analysis of intron phases of plant genes [Long, M

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Janssen, E. Kellogg, and N. Sinha, submitted manuscript), is also shown to be absent from the Po leaf and floral organ primordia (J.A. Long et al, 1996). In contrast, the LeT6 homeobox gene is expressed throughout wild-type shoot apical meristems and in immature leaves in tomato.…”
Section: Role Of Class 1 Knox Genes In Leaf Lnitiation and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Janssen, E. Kellogg, and N. Sinha, submitted manuscript), is also shown to be absent from the Po leaf and floral organ primordia (J.A. Long et al, 1996). In contrast, the LeT6 homeobox gene is expressed throughout wild-type shoot apical meristems and in immature leaves in tomato.…”
Section: Role Of Class 1 Knox Genes In Leaf Lnitiation and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that these modules were moved around to give rise to modern genes by using the process termed exon shuffling (Gilbert, 1978;M. Long et al, 1995M. Long et al, , 1996.…”
Section: Evolutionary Lmplications Of Gene Fusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All insertion-based differences in protein-coding sequences necessarily retained the correct reading frame (multiples of three nucleotides) such that the downstream TBP CORE region would still be translated; however in the 3′ UTR, small sequence insertions and deletions were even more common and were of arbitrary sizes (4,7,8,18, and 23 nucleotides). (24) Thus, unlike point mutations that are constrained by proofreading and natural selection, our data suggested a much more predominant role for natural selection (i.e.…”
Section: Evolution Of Tbp Suggests Insertion-based Genesis Of Novel Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Analyses of protein and genome sequences reveal the traces of two predominant mechanisms for creation of novel proteins: (1) gene, genomic region, or genome duplication followed by divergence(2-4) and (2) recombination of sequences encoding portions of existing proteins, such as by exon shuffling. (1,3,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) Gene duplication can produce a second copy of a gene in one generation; however, considerable subsequent mutation and genetic drift may be required before the two resultant genes become functionally distinct. Conversely, recombination can yield a functionally novel protein in a single event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%