Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5606-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exoplanet Detection Methods

Abstract: This chapter reviews various methods of detecting planetary companions to stars from an observational perspective, focusing on radial velocities, astrometry, direct imaging, transits, and gravitational microlensing. For each method, this chapter first derives or summarizes the basic observable phenomena that are used to infer the existence of planetary companions, as well as the physical properties of the planets and host stars that can be derived from the measurement of these signals. This chapter then outlin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(194 reference statements)
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the light curve shape deviates from a pure sinusoid. In order to see if such deviations naturally arise within our model, we maximised the Bayesian likelihood over five parameters (period P , velocity amplitude K, eccentricity e, argument of pericentre ω, and an arbitrary ref-erence time t 0 ) of a Kepler orbit 23 and fit the observed optical light-curve. In this procedure, we accounted for additional stochastic physical variability with a broken power-law power spectrum (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the light curve shape deviates from a pure sinusoid. In order to see if such deviations naturally arise within our model, we maximised the Bayesian likelihood over five parameters (period P , velocity amplitude K, eccentricity e, argument of pericentre ω, and an arbitrary ref-erence time t 0 ) of a Kepler orbit 23 and fit the observed optical light-curve. In this procedure, we accounted for additional stochastic physical variability with a broken power-law power spectrum (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in the best candidate systems, any signatures seem to be transient (Shkolnik et al 2008). As a striking counterexample, the extreme WASP-18 system, which contains a ≃ 10M Jup planet in a 0.94 d period, shows no evidence for planet-linked activity (Miller et al 2012;Pillitteri et al 2014b); such interaction must be either absent, only rarely present, or 8 We ignore the distinction between M P and the minimum mass of explanets derived from radial velocity work, since the sin i inclination term is unknown for most of these systems but provides a typical correction of only ∼15% (Wright & Gaudi 2013). rendered inefficient by an extremely weak stellar magnetic field 9 Shkolnik et al 2013; but see also Miller et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the present state of exoplanet detection techniques, most likely none of the rocky planets of the solar system would be discovered, even around a star as close as α Centauri, our closest Sun-like neighbor, located at the distance of 1.34 pc (Wright & Gaudi 2013). Rocky planets would only be found if the observer (located in a random direction near the solar system) was lucky enough to observe their transits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%