2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab53ec
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exoplanet Imitators: A Test of Stellar Activity Behavior in Radial Velocity Signals

Abstract: Accurately modeling effects from stellar activity is a key step in detecting radial velocity signals of low-mass and long-period exoplanets. Radial velocities from stellar activity are dominated by magnetic active regions that move in and out of sight as the star rotates, producing signals with timescales related to the stellar rotation period. Methods to characterize radial velocity periodograms assume that peaks from magnetic active regions will typically occur at the stellar rotation period or a related har… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ñightly) RV time-series at orbital periods longer than the stellar rotation period, as is the case for AU Mic b. However, for more sparsely sampled RV cadences such as ours, stellar activity can introduce apparent periodicities at time-scales longer than the stellar rotation period that can persist for several seasons 41 . The long-term magnetic activity evolution of AU Mic on timescales >100 days is also neither constrained nor modeled.…”
Section: Additional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…ñightly) RV time-series at orbital periods longer than the stellar rotation period, as is the case for AU Mic b. However, for more sparsely sampled RV cadences such as ours, stellar activity can introduce apparent periodicities at time-scales longer than the stellar rotation period that can persist for several seasons 41 . The long-term magnetic activity evolution of AU Mic on timescales >100 days is also neither constrained nor modeled.…”
Section: Additional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We note that this feature at P rot /2 is similar to the first harmonic of P rot observed on the Sun that has been shown to have either a comparable amount or at times more power than at P rot (Mortier & Collier Cameron 2017;Milbourne et al 2019). However, we note that simulated RV time series with injected quasi-periodic magnetic activity signals have been shown to produce spurious, and sometimes long-lived, periodogram signals that can masquerade as rotation signatures (Nava et al 2020). But given that the 22day signal is nearly identical to the first harmonic of the measured rotation period, we proceed with treating the 22-day signal as stellar activity and opt to simultaneously fit the HARPS-N and HIRES RVs with model components for TOI-1235 b, in the form of a Keplerian orbit, plus a quasi-periodic GP regression model of stellar activity whose covariance kernel as a function of time t takes the form…”
Section: Precise Rv Analysissupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In our GP activity model, we measure an exponential timescale of λ=115±20 days, indicating that active regions are relatively stable over a few rotation cycles. According to detailed investigations of periodogram signals in simulated RV time series, the persistence of the maximum RV activity peak at P rot /2 is consistent with active region lifetimes on TOI-1235 exceeding P rot (Nava et al 2020).…”
Section: Precise Rv Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Signals at 12 and 17.4 d verify the five points listed above and are thus considered as planets. We, however, point out that the predicted rotation period of the star is 18 ± 5 d. This means that signals could be present in this period range, not necessarily at the stellar rotation period or its harmonic (Nava et al 2020). Furthermore, in Appendix B, we show that the 17.4 d signal is less significant and that certain noise models favor 17.7 d over 17.4 d. It appears that fitting signals at 17.4 or 17.7 d does not completely remove the other.…”
Section: Periodicity Originmentioning
confidence: 76%