Exotic Lonicera species both escape and resist specialist and generalist herbivores in the introduced range in North America

Lieurance, Deah; Cipollini, Don

doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0402-y

Cited by 39 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…in field and laboratory settings. Lonicera maackii had significantly less foliage damage and was not affected by the sawfly specialist, which preferred L. reticulata over L. maackii when given a choice (Lieurance and Cipollini 2013b). The generalist caterpillar fed equally on all Lonicera species, but, in laboratory assays, effects on L. maackii were more strongly observed (Lieurance and Cipollini 2013b).…”

Section: Lonicera Maackii Effects On Ecosystem Processesmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Lonicera maackii had significantly less foliage damage and was not affected by the sawfly specialist, which preferred L. reticulata over L. maackii when given a choice (Lieurance and Cipollini 2013b). The generalist caterpillar fed equally on all Lonicera species, but, in laboratory assays, effects on L. maackii were more strongly observed (Lieurance and Cipollini 2013b). These findings lend support to the NWH and ERH because (a) L. maackii produces allelochemicals that negatively affect native plants and arthropods, (b) herbivory is quite low on L. maackii, and (c) this invasive can escape from specialist and generalist insect herbivores, which hinder native honeysuckle and confamiliars.…”

Section: Lonicera Maackii Effects On Ecosystem Processesmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Cipollini et al (2008c) identified secondary compounds in L. maackii leachate that decreased insect herbivore consumption and native seed germination, suggesting allelochemistry may in part explain why L. maackii is so successful and lending support to the NWH. Lieurance and Cipollini (2013b) also studied the herbivory effects of the specialist North American honeysuckle sawfly (Zaraea inflata: Cimbicidae) and the generalist caterpillar Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm: Noctuidae) on L. maackii, grape honeysuckle (Lonicera reticulata Raf. ), blackhaw (Viburnum prunifolium L.), and L. japonica (Japanese honeysuckle Thunb.)…”

Section: Lonicera Maackii Effects On Ecosystem Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Arthropod Communities on Native and Nonnative Early Successional Plants

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Lonicera Maackii Effects On Ecosystem Processesmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Lonicera Maackii Effects On Ecosystem Processesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Lonicera Maackii Effects On Ecosystem Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Arthropod Communities on Native and Nonnative Early Successional Plants

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Extracts of L. maackii leaves have been shown to deter feeding by the generalist herbivore beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) in a choice bioassay (Cipollini et al 2008b). A choice feeding bioassay conducted by Lieurance and Cipollini (2013) reported that L. maackii was able to serve as a suitable host for the generalist herbivore fall armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) and the honeysuckle specialist sawfly (Zaraea inflate). However, L. maackii leaves experienced substantially lower amounts of herbivory from fall armyworms and honeysuckle specialist sawflies than the native Lonicera reticulata (grape honeysuckle).…”

Section: Effects On Animal and Plant Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Earthworm, microbial biomass, and leaf litter decay responses after invasive honeysuckle shrub removal from urban woodlands.

Pipal¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Anurag Agrawal kindly provided us with the raw data of dataset 1, and Marion Zuefle provided us with a copy of her thesis (Zuefle, 2006) which contained the raw data of dataset 47. We derived the data of datasets 7,8,38,55,58,61,[65][66][67][68] from the figures in the articles (Adams et al, 2008;Cripps et al, 2010;Vilà et al, 2005;Hartly et al, 2010;Harvey et al, 2015;Lieurance and Cipollini, 2013;Lombardero et al, 2008;Wolfe, 2002). For all datasets the mean, standard deviation, and number of plant species were taken for native and for non-native plants.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

Supplemental Information 3: Supplementary Info 1. Raw Data Used for Meta Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A suggested mechanism for the success of introduced non-native species is the enemy release hypothesis (ERH). Many studies have tested the predictions of the ERH using the community approach (native and non-native species studied in the same habitat) or the biogeographical approach (species studied in their native and non-native range), but results are highly variable, possibly due to large variety of study systems incorporated. We therefore focused on one specific system: plants and their herbivorous insects. We performed a systematic review and compiled a large number (68) of datasets from studies comparing herbivorous insects on native and non-native plants using the community or biogeographical approach. We performed a meta-analysis to test the predictions from the ERH for insect diversity (number of species), insect load (number of individuals) and level of herbivory for both the community and biogeographical approach. For both the community and biogeographical approach insect diversity was significantly higher on native than on non-native plants. Insect load tended to be higher on native than nonnative plants at the community approach only. Herbivory was not different between native and non-native plants at the community approach, while there was too little data available for testing the biogeographical approach. Our meta-analysis generally supports the predictions from the ERH for both the community and biogeographical approach, but also shows that the outcome is importantly determined by the response measured and approach applied. So far, very few studies apply both approaches simultaneously in a reciprocal manner while this is arguably the best way for testing the ERH. AbstractA suggested mechanism for the success of introduced non-native species is the enemy release hypothesis (ERH). Many studies have tested the predictions of the ERH using the community approach (native and non-native species studied in the same habitat) or the biogeographical approach (species studied in their native and non-native range), but results are highly variable, possibly due to large variety of study systems incorporated. We therefore focused on one specific system: plants and their herbivorous insects. We performed a systematic review and compiled a large number (68) of datasets from studies comparing herbivorous insects on native and nonnative plants using the community or biogeographical approach. We performed a meta-analysis to test the predictions from the ERH for insect diversity (number of species), insect load (number of individuals) and level of herbivory for both the community and biogeographical approach. For both the community and biogeographical approach insect diversity was significantly higher on native than on non-native plants. Insect load tended to be higher on native than non-native plants at the community approach only. Herbivory was not different between native and non-native plants at the community approach, while there was too little data available for testing the biogeographical approach. Our meta-a...

show abstract

Exotic Lonicera species both escape and resist specialist and generalist herbivores in the introduced range in North America

Cited by 39 publications

References 51 publications

Arthropod Communities on Native and Nonnative Early Successional Plants

Arthropod Communities on Native and Nonnative Early Successional Plants

Earthworm, microbial biomass, and leaf litter decay responses after invasive honeysuckle shrub removal from urban woodlands.

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About