1993
DOI: 10.1016/0148-6195(93)90028-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanded securities underwriting: Implications for bank risk and return

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eisenbeis et al (1984) examine the announcement effects of the formation of bank holding companies on shareholder returns and conclude that diversification enhances bank value. However, Apilado et al (1993) find only weak support for the hypothesis that bank expansion into securities underwriting activities is value enhancing. Brewer (1989) examines the effect of non-banking activities on bank holding company (BHC) risk and finds that they are associated with a reduced probability of bankruptcy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Eisenbeis et al (1984) examine the announcement effects of the formation of bank holding companies on shareholder returns and conclude that diversification enhances bank value. However, Apilado et al (1993) find only weak support for the hypothesis that bank expansion into securities underwriting activities is value enhancing. Brewer (1989) examines the effect of non-banking activities on bank holding company (BHC) risk and finds that they are associated with a reduced probability of bankruptcy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Section 20 relaxation GLB passage Apilado, Gallo, and Lockwood (1993) Commercial banks and investment banks 1987 √ Positive reaction for commercial banks, negative reaction for investment banks. Bhargava and Fraser (1998) Commercial banks 1987-1999 √ Positive reaction for initial relaxation of Section 20 limits, but negative for subsequent changes.…”
Section: Period Studied Change Examined Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutual funds appear to be a logical extension of the traditional investment management services offered by banks through their trust departments. However, the Glass‐Steagall Act of 1933 barred banks from engaging in most securities activities (Apilado, Gallo, and Lockwood (1993)). The Act left banks free only to manage fund assets and to broker funds whose assets they do not manage.…”
Section: Regulatory Environment For Bank‐managed Mutual Fundsmentioning
confidence: 99%