1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb05913.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanded Tables for Multiple Comparison Procedures in the Analysis of Ranked Data

Abstract: Multiple comparison procedures involving Friedman rank sums for the analysis of ranked data have recently been proposed as alternatives to tests developed by Kramer. Expanded tables for these multiple comparison procedures (involving the "all treatments" and "treatments versus control" comparisons) were presented to accomodate the range of panelists and samples usually encountered in sensory evaluation experiments involving ranked data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
94
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
94
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The fat content of different batches of sausages was influenced by the addition of skin in the recipe. This results of this study is in consonance of Venturini et al, 2011 but slightly varied from those that reported by Newell et al, 1987. The protein content found in this study was significantly higher than the maximum limit, while the moisture content was slightly over the recommended percentage.…”
Section: Centesimal Parameter Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The fat content of different batches of sausages was influenced by the addition of skin in the recipe. This results of this study is in consonance of Venturini et al, 2011 but slightly varied from those that reported by Newell et al, 1987. The protein content found in this study was significantly higher than the maximum limit, while the moisture content was slightly over the recommended percentage.…”
Section: Centesimal Parameter Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…b Same letters within the column indicate no significant differences (P50.001) between the means according to the critical values of differences among rank sums for multiple comparisons (Friedman multiple means comparison, Newell and MacFarlane, 1987). weight (DW) and RSSC (Crisosto, 1992;Slaughter and Crisosto, 1998), although the correlation between DW and RSSC has not been acceptable under Californian conditions.…”
Section: Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the previous analysis, the Friedman multiple means comparison (Newell and MacFarlane, 1987;Basker, 1988) procedure for ranked data for the two combined seasons was used to compare degree of liking. Percentage consumer acceptance was also calculated in all of the cases.…”
Section: In Store Consumer Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Análise dos resultados: os resultados foram analisados usando a tabela de NEWELL E MAC FARLANE (1987) [23].…”
Section: -Descrição Do Testeunclassified