Doubt-Free Uncertainty in Measurement 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12063-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanded Uncertainty of a Measurement and an Uncertainty Budget for a Single Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For larger volumes, the absolute bias becomes somewhat larger and reaches up to −27 nl. Given the measurement uncertainty of the gravimetric method and the Artel method [24] as shown in figure 4, all measured values have to be considered to be consistent, since the bias is always smaller than the corresponding measurement uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger volumes, the absolute bias becomes somewhat larger and reaches up to −27 nl. Given the measurement uncertainty of the gravimetric method and the Artel method [24] as shown in figure 4, all measured values have to be considered to be consistent, since the bias is always smaller than the corresponding measurement uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of assuming that the goal of measurement is the closest possible estimation of an unknown true value (the Error Approach), metrology now holds that measurement information supports only an assignment of a range of values, given that no mistakes have been made. This range varies depending on what information is taken into account, leading to the development of uncertainty budgets (Bucher, 2012;Ratcliffe et al, 2015).…”
Section: Uncertainty In Metrology and Psychometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory-informed empirical research on reading ability has begun to approximate the level of detail obtained in the construction of instruments in the natural sciences (Andrich, in press;Fisher & Stenner, 2016;Mari & Wilson, 2014;Pendrill & Fisher, 2015;Pendrill, 2014a;Stenner et al, 2013;Wright, 1997). Implications for uncertainty budgets and the practical interpretation of psychometric measures begin from a distinction between Type A and Type B uncertainties (Committee and for Guides in Metrology (JCGM, WG 1) Evaluation of measurement data-Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement 2008; Ratcliffe et al, 2015).…”
Section: Uncertainty Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 99%