2016
DOI: 10.1177/0840470416645601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding patient engagement in quality improvement and health system redesign

Abstract: Healthcare organizations face growing pressures to increase patient-centred care and to involve patients more in organizational decisions. Yet many providers worry that such involvement requires additional time and resources and do not see patients as capable of contributing meaningfully to decisions. This article discusses three efforts in four organizations to engage patients in quality improvement efforts. McGill University Health Centre, Saskatoon Health Region, and Vancouver Coastal and Fraser Health Regi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
89
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
89
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…QI teams can utilize patient interviews, patient experience surveys, and patient co‐design to engage patients. The patient perspective on a problem often leads to unexpected solutions that were in the “blindspots” of clinicians . Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation patients and their families constitute readily available cohorts of potential QI project collaborators.
We interviewed inpatients to help understand potential barriers to taking the required medications, and patient feedback was used when developing the intervention .
…”
Section: Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QI teams can utilize patient interviews, patient experience surveys, and patient co‐design to engage patients. The patient perspective on a problem often leads to unexpected solutions that were in the “blindspots” of clinicians . Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation patients and their families constitute readily available cohorts of potential QI project collaborators.
We interviewed inpatients to help understand potential barriers to taking the required medications, and patient feedback was used when developing the intervention .
…”
Section: Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those cases where patients are engaged at the partnership level have encountered a number of challenges, including clinical staff concerns about involving patients, recruitment and training issues, differences in content knowledge, and perceived power between patients and clinical staff . Even when organizations make an effort to bring patients in as full partners, only a few are typically included, often relegating them to token participation . Overall, the studies that exist report variable benefits of engaging patients as partners and describe a need for more evidence‐based models …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Patient engagement at the organizational-design level has been primarily confined to consultation, using mechanisms such as patient-experience surveys or patient advisory councils. 2,6 There have been recent examples of health-care organizations testing more robust approaches of engaging patients in quality improvement or care design 7 ; however, patients are still seldom brought in as partners or coleaders. 3,8 Those cases where patients are engaged at the partnership level have encountered a number of challenges, including clinical staff concerns about involving patients, recruitment and training issues, differences in content knowledge, and perceived power between patients and clinical staff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations