2014
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding Public-Private Collaborations to Enhance Cancer Drug Development: A Report of the Institute of Medicine's Workshop Series, “Implementing a National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century”

Abstract: Since their inception in the 1950s, the National Cancer Institute‐funded cancer cooperative groups have been important contributors to cancer clinical and translational research. In 2010, a committee appointed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences completed a consensus review on the status of the U.S. publicly funded cancer clinical trials system. This report identified a need to reinvigorate the cooperative groups and provided recommendations for improving their effectiveness.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 29 For example, the NIH experience with large clinical trials is now heavily reliant on industry support as private enterprise can harness their existing global network of diverse clinical trial sites instead of laboriously developing their own. 30 There are also drawbacks to this sort of partnership, particularly in the form of conflicts of interest. 31 It is, therefore, crucial that any conflict of interest is declared and that research is conducted with full transparency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 For example, the NIH experience with large clinical trials is now heavily reliant on industry support as private enterprise can harness their existing global network of diverse clinical trial sites instead of laboriously developing their own. 30 There are also drawbacks to this sort of partnership, particularly in the form of conflicts of interest. 31 It is, therefore, crucial that any conflict of interest is declared and that research is conducted with full transparency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,69 Patients are also a scarce resource, with the number of patients treated in US National Cancer Institute (NCI)funded cancer cooperative group trials having declined from 29,000 in 2008 to 17,000 in 2015. 1 As Stensland et al 13 highlight, incomplete trials leave promising therapies untested and shift valuable patients and finances away from addressing other critical questions.…”
Section: Key Finding 2: Poor Accrual Leads To Low-value Trials and Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industry can contribute resources-like new biological agents, finances, and trained personnel-to support trial operations. 1 Recent studies also show that industry can run efficient trials, 17,72 although its promptness may be motivated by the desire to market a successful therapy. 17…”
Section: Key Finding 3: a Complex View Of Private Sector Financing Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A funding increase for high-accruing sites is being implemented. The next step in the restructuring of the groups, as detailed in the report on IOM workshops elsewhere in this issue [3], will be to bring the groups into the mainstream of targeted cancer drug development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The report of the IOM's Workshop Series on "Implementing a Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century," found elsewhere in this issue [3], offers a number of possibilities for new directions: comparison of multiple different agents for a given tumor subset; "basket" trials for a selected mutation (e.g., b-RAF or RET) and its targeted drug across multiple tumor histologies; trials in often neglected patient populations, such as children or the elderly; adjuvant trials in rare patient subsets; and combinations of drugs (with chemotherapy or with other targeted agents from different firms). Examples are provided of three new NCI group trials (L-MAP, MATCH, and ALCHEMIST) that require screening of extremely large patient populations (e.g., up to 8,000 in the L-MAP trial) to identify those with uncommon mutations and then assign appropriate patients to the logical new drug.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%