2013
DOI: 10.1177/1473095213506202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the ‘dark side of planning’: Governmentality and biopolitics in urban garden planning

Abstract: This article analyses Bent Flyvbjerg's 'dark side of planning' theory and proposes to increase its critical strength by including, together with ideas of rationality and power, two further theoretical tools: the Foucauldian concepts of governmentality and biopolitics. The potentiality of this inclusion is exemplified by the analysis provided about the influence of 18th-century colonial governmentality on the real rationality of public garden planning in the modern liberal cities of most western European coloni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the urban gardens within this context can be argued to be tools of disciplining the social fabric and making the projects embody or reproduce entrepreneurial values (McClintock, 2014;Weissman, 2015). Gardeners may unwittingly integrate mainstream post-crisis subjectivities that naturalize the self-responsibility about urban improvement and transformation, hindering more collective political actions (Certomà, 2015).…”
Section: Discussion: Unearthing the Meanings And Politics Of Urban Gamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the urban gardens within this context can be argued to be tools of disciplining the social fabric and making the projects embody or reproduce entrepreneurial values (McClintock, 2014;Weissman, 2015). Gardeners may unwittingly integrate mainstream post-crisis subjectivities that naturalize the self-responsibility about urban improvement and transformation, hindering more collective political actions (Certomà, 2015).…”
Section: Discussion: Unearthing the Meanings And Politics Of Urban Gamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationalities of biopolitics underpin multiple facets of urban politics, from planning and governance, to security and citizenship. Planning, for example, acts as a biopolitical strategy that regulates urban populations, both human and non‐human (see Certoma 2015; Ploger 2008), while promoting “enjoyment” for “normative” residents (see Rutland 2015). Meanwhile, housing serves as a biopolitical intervention for idealised residents—from formalising schemes that transform informal settlers into homeowners (Campbell 2013) to mortgage arrangements that tie future labour and wellbeing to volatile property markets (Garcia‐Lamarka and Kaika 2016).…”
Section: Urbanisation and (Bio)necropoliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper is a theoreticallyinformed analysis of planning regulation and is therefore characteristic of the 'practice turn' in planning theory (Inch, 2018, p. 205). Foucauldian analyses of planning are typically associated with a 'dark side of planning theory' emphasising social control, surveillance and subjection (Inch, 2018;Huxley, 2018;Yiftachel, 1998;Flyvbjerg, 1996;Certomà, 2015). Yet this reflects a partial account of Foucault's work (Huxley, 2018) and an increasing range of studies focus on expanding Foucault's concepts applied to planning, including the concept of governmentality (Certomà, 2015).…”
Section: Governmentality and Land-use Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%