“…Going back to the early 1900s, a broad array of psychometric, biological, and behavioral genetic evidence (e.g., see Carroll, 1993;Jensen, 1998) has given rise to a broad consensus among experts that cognitive abilities are real psychological constructs (Gottfredson, 1997a;Reeve & Charles, 2008;Snyderman & Rothman, 1987), that they have a significant and meaningful influence on important real-world outcomes (e.g. Batty et al, 2008;Gottfredson, 1997Gottfredson, , 2004Kuncel et al, 2004;Reeve, 2009;Schmidt & Hunter, 1998), that they have a basis in human biology and physiology (Gottfredson, 1997;Deary, 2009 [special issues of Intelligence]; Lubinski, 2004 [special section of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology]) and that they are consistent with predictions from evolutionary psychology (Kanazawa, 2004;Kanazawa, 2010;Reeve, Lyerly, & Peach, 2013). When domain-specific constructs or alternative complex constructs such as "cross-functional strategic thinking" are proposed, it is important to consider whether they are as parsimonious as extant models, whether they have a basis in the evolution, biology or physiology of the central nervous system, and whether they have been empirically vetted against extant constructs using appropriate quantitative methods.…”