2020
DOI: 10.1111/pde.14231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the phenotypes of congenital hemangiomas

Abstract: Congenital hemangiomas (CH) are benign vascular tumors that are typically defined as having had complete intrauterine development and to be fully formed at birth. They demonstrate several clinical and histologic features that are different from infantile hemangiomas (IH). One of the most characteristic differences is that CH are negative when stained for the immunohistochemical marker GLUT-1. 1 CH can be classified into three subgroups depending on their evolution: rapidly involuting CH (RICH), non-involuting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vascular changes manifest as increased telangiectasia or venous prominence and the formation of papules or pyogenic granulomas on the surface (11,18,19). Reports of CHs that increase in size in the months or years after birth (12,(18)(19)(20) have led some authors to propose the term tardive expansion congenital haemangioma (TECH) (12). Atypical changes may be associated with the occurrence of thrombocytopaenia and localized coagulopathy, and have mainly been described in NICH and PICH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vascular changes manifest as increased telangiectasia or venous prominence and the formation of papules or pyogenic granulomas on the surface (11,18,19). Reports of CHs that increase in size in the months or years after birth (12,(18)(19)(20) have led some authors to propose the term tardive expansion congenital haemangioma (TECH) (12). Atypical changes may be associated with the occurrence of thrombocytopaenia and localized coagulopathy, and have mainly been described in NICH and PICH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%