“…We denote by RC ev , FSRC ev , SRC ev , QC ev , FSQC ev , SQC ev the restriction of the properties we have been studying in the previous section to evaluated formulae (in the case of continuous t-norm based logics), or to positively evaluated formulae (in the case of WNM-t-norm based logics). 19 These completeness properties are straightforwardly refuted in many cases. Namely, for each * ∈ CONT-fin \ { * G } L * ∀ has not the RC and thus there is a constant-free formula ϕ such that L * ∀ ϕ and |= [0,1] * ϕ, and hence, since ϕ is equivalent to the evaluated formula 1 → ϕ and L * ∀(C) is a conservative expansion of L * ∀, we also have a counterexample to the RC ev of L * ∀(C).…”