Expanding the reach: ethnobotanical knowledge and technological intensification in beekeeping among the Ogiek of the Mau Forest, Kenya

Abstract

Background Initiatives for beekeeping intensification across the tropics can foster production and income, but the changes triggered by the introduction of modern beehives might permeate traditional knowledge and practices in multiple ways, and as such should be investigated and understood. We conducted an ethnobotanical study in the Eastern part of the Mau Forest among Ogiek beekeepers who customarily practice forest beekeeping and who are involved in a project aimed at the modernization of their beekeeping activities. We aimed to document the beekeeping-associated ethnobotanical knowledge, exploring the relationships and complementarity between modern and traditional knowledge and practices. Methods Field research was carried out through semi-structured interviews with 30 Ogiek beekeepers and 10 additional stakeholders. We collected ethnobotanical data about plants used for beekeeping purposes, and ethnographic information on traditional and modern beekeeping systems. Results We report 66 plant species, distributed across 36 botanical families representing 58 genera, important as melliferous, for the construction and placing of hives, attracting bees, and harvesting and storing honey. Dombeya torrida (J.F.Gmel.) Bamps, Juniperus procera Hochst. ex Endl., and Podocarpus latifolius (Thunb.) R.Br. ex Mirb. are the species with the most mentions and the highest number of uses. Our study reveals that the Ogiek possess a detailed knowledge of the forest’s flora, its importance and uses and that this knowledge underpins beekeeping practices. Under the influence of external actors, the Ogiek have progressively adopted modern versus traditional log hives and moved beekeeping out of the forest into open areas of pastures and crop fields. Beekeepers are also experimenting with combinations of practices borrowed from modern and traditional beekeeping systems, particularly in the field of hive construction and in the criteria to set up apiaries. Conclusions The study indicates a complementarity and an incipient hybridization of traditional and modern beekeeping, in a way that suggests that modern beehives are instrumental in expanding the reach of beekeeping into deforested and cultivated areas. The study also points to the existence of a rift in the effects of beekeeping intensification on the livelihoods of the Ogiek and on their relationship with the forest. We argue that this intensification might be improving the former but weakening the latter, carrying the associated risk of erosion of traditional forest-based ethnobotanical knowledge.

Ethnobotanical knowledge of Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman (Rosaceae) by people living in community forests in North Kivu, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo

“…In the same vein, Zocchi et al (2020) found that the wood of P. africana is highly valued by local people in the manufacture of beehives. The wood of this species results in a highly valued hive in terms of its durability.…”

Stingless bees: uses and management by meliponiculturist women in the Chaco region of Bolivia

“…In this sense, and based on our results, it appears that traditional knowledge on bees is not significantly different between ethnic groups involved in meliponiculture. Although processes such as globalization potentially result in the loss of traditional knowledge [ 59 ], traditional and cultural knowledge is dynamic and in many cases these processes lead to changes and transformation rather than loss [ 60 , 61 ]. These changes can mean that indeed some traditional knowledge is lost, but they may also lead to the uptake of new knowledge and, when many ethnic groups live together, also to the homogenization of knowledge [ 62 ].…”

Medicinal herbs used by the local peoples in Rajshahi metropolitan area of Bangladesh

“…The documented medicinal information is comparable with the result of other studies in Abroad and Bangladesh. In Kenya, a total of 66 plant species under 58 genera belonging to 36 families were reported as medicinal values [99].In India, a total of 40 plant species 37 genera and 28 families were recorded for medicinal purposes [104]. In Pakistan, A total of 150 medicinal plants belonging to 98 genera and 60 families were documented [100].…”