2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansion of magnetic flux concentrations: a comparison of Hinode SOT data and models

Abstract: Context. The expansion of network magnetic fields with height is a fundamental property of flux tube models. A rapid expansion is required to form a magnetic canopy. Aims. We characterize the observed expansion properties of magnetic network elements and compare them with the thin flux tube and sheet approximations, as well as with magnetoconvection simulations. Methods. We used data from the Hinode SOT NFI NaD 1 channel and spectropolarimeter to study the appearance of magnetic flux concentrations seen in cir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expansion of the selected MFCs and the models agreed well, supporting previous results reported by Pietarila et al (2010). At the highest inverted layers the field did expand somewhat less rapidly than in the model, however, probably due to the interactions (merging) with other magnetic features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The expansion of the selected MFCs and the models agreed well, supporting previous results reported by Pietarila et al (2010). At the highest inverted layers the field did expand somewhat less rapidly than in the model, however, probably due to the interactions (merging) with other magnetic features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is evident from the increasing size and "fuzzier" appearance of these concentrations at decreasing optical depths. The variations of B LOS with optical depth both near the centers and boundaries of these flux concentrations are thus consistent with canopy fields expanding with height, as demonstrated indirectly from the center-to-limb variations of the LOS magnetic field of network field by Pietarila et al (2010) and from Sunrise data by Martínez González et al (2012).…”
Section: Networksupporting
confidence: 68%
“…For convenience we use a numerical flux tube model based on the thin flux tube approximation. Previous works (e.g., Grossmann-Doerth et al 1988;Bruls & Solanki 1995;Solanki et al 1999;Yelles Chaouche et al 2009;Pietarila et al 2010) have found that the expansion of magnetic fields with height in the photosphere is consistent with the thin flux tube approximation (Roberts & Webb 1978;Defouw 1976). Here we wish to see if this is also true in the higher layers sampled by the Ca ii 854.2 line core magnetograms.…”
Section: Comparison Of Observations With a Flux Tube Modelsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Note that the thin flux tube approximation is strictly valid only when the flux tube radius is smaller than the gas pressure or density scale heights, i.e., both of the constructed models are outside the strict validity range of the approximation but that is not significant for this exploration. As shown in Pietarila et al (2010), the choice of r 0 , and to lesser extent B 0 , are the main factors for the expansion, while the choice of the flux tube interior atmospheric model plays in comparison an insignificant role.…”
Section: Comparison Of Observations With a Flux Tube Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%