We treated 72 patients with metastatic renal-cell cancer according to 2 protocols consisting of two 5-week induction cycles of continuous i.v. high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), i.m. interferon-ru (IFNa) and ex vivo IL-2-activated lymphocytes, followed for patients with stable disease (SD), partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) by four 4-week maintenance cycles of IL-2 and IFNa Protocol 2 (55 patients) differed from protocol I (I 7 patients) in (i) the addition of IFNa to the first IL-2 infusions in both induction cycles; (ii) the use of Teceleukin IL-2, reconstituted with carrier protein, instead of Proleukin IL-2 without carrier protein. We classified 23 patients with CR and PR as responders (4 in protocol I and I 9 in protocol 2) and 45 patients with SD and progressive disease as non-responders. Prior to immunotherapy, patients entered into protocol 2 already had higher IFNy serum concentrations, higher peripheral blood CD56-,3+ and CD8-,4+ lymphocyte numbers and lower NkSb2 activity than those entered into protocol I. These differences persisted during and after imrnunotherapy. In line with these observations, ex vim IL-2-activated lymphocytes had larger proportions of CD56-,3+ and CD8-,4+ lymphocytes and lower NKKS62 activity in protocol 2 than in protocol I. Higher IL-2 serum concentrations were reached during the IL-2 infusions in protocol 2 than in protocol I. In addition, the imrnunomodulation in protocol 2 was stronger than in protocol I as indicated by higher TNFa serum concentrations and a more pronounced eosinophiiia. Differences between responders and non-responders treated according to the 2 protocols were not significant, except for the total number of lymphocytes obtained by apheresis, which was higher in responders than in non-responders. Analysis of relationships between clinical and immunological responses to this type of combination immunotherapy can yield 2 types of valuable information. First, the results of such studies may provide insight into the mechanism of the therapeutic effect, which still is not understood, although cause and effect cannot be strictly distinguished in the interpretation of results obtained during and after therapy. Second, the results may help in the identification and selection of patients who are likely to respond to this toxic and expensive therapy. Although the effects of IL-2 with or without IFNa and/or ex vivo