1989
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90135-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansion of receptive fields of spinal lamina I projection neurons in rats with unilateral adjuvant-induced inflammation: the contribution of dorsal horn mechanisms

Abstract: We have physiologically characterized the receptive field properties of lamina I projection neurons with cutaneous input in the lumbar spinal cords of control rats and rats with unilateral adjuvant-induced inflammation of the hindlimb. The majority of cells recorded in rats with inflamed limbs demonstrated properties uncharacteristic of this cell population in control rats, including large receptive fields, discontinuous receptive fields, responsiveness to deep as well as cutaneous tissues and ongoing or burst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
120
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
12
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord with receptive fields adjacent to a cutaneous heat injury expand their receptive fields to incorporate the site of injury (McMahon and Wall 1984). Similar recept~ve field expansions have been observed in spinal cord following mechanical (Cervero et al 1988), chemical (Hoheisel and Mense 1989;Woolf and King 1990), inflammatory (Hylden et a!. 1989) and nerve (Devor and Wall 1978) injuries, as well as following the induction of polyarthritis (Menetry and Besson 1982;Calvino et al 1987) and in response to electrical nerve stimulation (Cook et al 1987).…”
Section: Central Sensitizationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord with receptive fields adjacent to a cutaneous heat injury expand their receptive fields to incorporate the site of injury (McMahon and Wall 1984). Similar recept~ve field expansions have been observed in spinal cord following mechanical (Cervero et al 1988), chemical (Hoheisel and Mense 1989;Woolf and King 1990), inflammatory (Hylden et a!. 1989) and nerve (Devor and Wall 1978) injuries, as well as following the induction of polyarthritis (Menetry and Besson 1982;Calvino et al 1987) and in response to electrical nerve stimulation (Cook et al 1987).…”
Section: Central Sensitizationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It is well established that peripheral nerve damage causes major alterations in physiology of the somatosensory system at the spinal, thalamic, and cortical levels (Devor and Wall, 1981a,b;Hylden et al, 1989;Hu and Sessle, 1989;Calford and Tweedale, 1988;Mao et al, 1993;Guilbaud et al, 1991Guilbaud et al, , 1992Halligan et al, 1993;Rasmusson et al, 1993;Elbert et al, 1994;Salimi et al, 1994). We recently reported increased resting (no overt stimulation) forebrain activity in somatosensory and limbic structures in CCI animals exhibiting spontaneous pain and hyperalgesia 2 weeks after surgery (Paulson et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The case for a central mechanism was supported by two main findings: the selective enhancement of ATP-evoked responses by NS, but not WDR, units in superficial laminae, despite the fact that P2X3 receptor expression was found in superficial and deep laminae (data not shown) and, second, enlarged pinch RF areas of WDR units in superficial and deep laminae compared with LE2 females. Enlargement of high-threshold cutaneous RF areas of dorsal horn neurons after peripheral tissue injury has traditionally been explained by central mechanisms such as disinhibition (Cook et al 1987;Hylden et al 1989;Laird and Cervero 1989). However, in hippocampus and other forebrain areas E2 significantly altered dendritic spine density (see Cooke and Woolley 2005;McEwen et al 2001), suggesting that structural effects of E2 also could have contributed to the changes in TMJ-evoked activity and cutaneous RF areas of Vc/C1-2 neurons.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of E2 Modulation Of Atp-evoked Activation Of Tmj mentioning
confidence: 99%