AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020
DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-1064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansion Tube Freestream Disturbance Measurements using a Focused Laser Differential Interferometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study is concerned with the transmitted shock itself, so the subsequent details of the HET operation will not be discussed further. An extensive campaign of freestream FLDI measurements were made in HET, with ∆Φ(t) acquired for a sample period spanning the entire start-up and test time [9]. This dataset contains shock velocities in the range 1.8 < U s < 3.6 km s −1 , in air at ambient temperature and pressures between 145 < P 1 < 275 mTorr.…”
Section: Experimental Campaign and Facility Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this study is concerned with the transmitted shock itself, so the subsequent details of the HET operation will not be discussed further. An extensive campaign of freestream FLDI measurements were made in HET, with ∆Φ(t) acquired for a sample period spanning the entire start-up and test time [9]. This dataset contains shock velocities in the range 1.8 < U s < 3.6 km s −1 , in air at ambient temperature and pressures between 145 < P 1 < 275 mTorr.…”
Section: Experimental Campaign and Facility Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freestream turbulence power spectra, with comparisons to hot-wire anemometry, were made in the Penn State Supersonic Wind Tunnel and AEDC Hypervelocity Wind Tunnel 9 [4,5]. Since then, the FLDI has been applied to several other supersonic and hypersonic ground-testing facilities [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%