2014
DOI: 10.1111/coep.12051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansionary Versus Contractionary Government Spending

Abstract: This article theoretically examines the impact of different forms of government spending on national income in a financially open economy with a significant net international investment position the central bank of which sets domestic interest rates to target inflation. It shows that whether government spending is expansionary or contractionary ultimately depends on the productivity of that expenditure, a result that has major implications for the efficacy of fiscal policy deployed for either stimulus or auste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fiscal contraction in the presence of public spending inefficiencies is, however, not necessarily effective. The productivity of government spending would ultimately determines whether government spending is expansionary or contractionary; unlike productive public investment, unproductive public investment and government consumption tend to be procyclical (Makin, 2014). Moreover, any fiscal consolidation will be more effective in bringing down debt only when it is adopted by efficient public sector and government apparatus (Heylen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Sem Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fiscal contraction in the presence of public spending inefficiencies is, however, not necessarily effective. The productivity of government spending would ultimately determines whether government spending is expansionary or contractionary; unlike productive public investment, unproductive public investment and government consumption tend to be procyclical (Makin, 2014). Moreover, any fiscal consolidation will be more effective in bringing down debt only when it is adopted by efficient public sector and government apparatus (Heylen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Sem Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive correlation of weak institutions with inefficiency can lead to fiscal policy procyclicality. Inefficient public spending tends to be procyclical compared to productive public spending (Makin, 2014). This procyclicality is apparent in developing countries, particularly those characterized by the corrupted and weak institutional environment (Alesina et al, 2008;Frankel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Implications Of These Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the fact that we owe the debt to non‐residents (as opposed to Australians in effect ‘owing it to ourselves’) is of concern because close to a billion dollars a month in public debt interest will be paid abroad in 2016–2017. Consistent with national accounting principles, this represents a net drain on Australia's national income (see Makin for elaboration).…”
Section: What Is the Sustainable Level Of Australia's Public Debt?mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The literature suggests that the rising rates of debt are the consequence of an unsound fiscal policy and, in addition, the lack of regulating and implementing stricter policies (Kukeli, 2014). The weakness of financial institutions leads to the likelihood of fiscal distress in the form of continued lagging financial policies and elevated vulnerability to external shocks (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2008;Makin, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, an increase in expenditure would fuel local economic activities and some private investment groups (Ncanywa & Masoga, 2018), placing the economy under more strain and financial distress. In an acclaimed theory of Keynesian regarding expenditure, it stated that the increasing government expenditure is linked to higher national output, which leads to employment (Makin, 2015). However, the assets and funding available for investment may have been crowded out by the increased government expenditure; therefore, the aim of availing funding to pertain more economic growth through investments is hindered.…”
Section: Theories Of Expenditure and Debtmentioning
confidence: 99%