2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.632322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansionist Intellectual Property Protection and Reductionist Competition Rules: A TRIPS Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Another argument suggests the problems are mostly of a more fundamental and systemic nature and relate to the effects of the patent system especially to the component industries, where anticommons issues have mainly been reported. In these areas, innovation can be characterised as 'an evolutionary process' (Howarth and MaMahon, 2008) which involves cumulative and sequential innovation (Reichman, 2000;Reichman and Lewis, 2005;Ullrich, 2005;Gowers Review, 2006) and where most innovators are 'standing on the shoulders of giants' (Scotchmer, 1991). This set-up challenges traditional patent law which can be described as being 'based on the idea of functionally independent proprietary elements' (Rahnasto, 2003).…”
Section: Clearing a Path Through The Thicketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 Another argument suggests the problems are mostly of a more fundamental and systemic nature and relate to the effects of the patent system especially to the component industries, where anticommons issues have mainly been reported. In these areas, innovation can be characterised as 'an evolutionary process' (Howarth and MaMahon, 2008) which involves cumulative and sequential innovation (Reichman, 2000;Reichman and Lewis, 2005;Ullrich, 2005;Gowers Review, 2006) and where most innovators are 'standing on the shoulders of giants' (Scotchmer, 1991). This set-up challenges traditional patent law which can be described as being 'based on the idea of functionally independent proprietary elements' (Rahnasto, 2003).…”
Section: Clearing a Path Through The Thicketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set-up challenges traditional patent law which can be described as being 'based on the idea of functionally independent proprietary elements' (Rahnasto, 2003). In an environment characterised by cumulative and incremental inventions, the 'individualistic orientation' (Ullrich, 2005) may serve as a brake on knowledge production and exploitation, rather than as a booster.…”
Section: Clearing a Path Through The Thicketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Hanns Ullrich noted, this intervention ''is to safeguard the incentive and reward rationales of intellectual property protection while at the same time controlling the risks of an undue extension of legal exclusivity''. 9 Nevertheless, now there is much more. This health crisis has taken place in the middle of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nub of the campaign centres on how these factors promote private rights over public commons (Drahos, 2005;Tansey, 2005;Ulrich, 2005) and restrict development policy space in developing countries (Wade, 2005;Chang, 2005). Opponents contend these block generic competition, raise drug prices, and divert R&D investment away from neglected diseases 2 (Mayne, 2002;Balasubramanian, 2002).…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%