2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.84.103516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansions in spin foam cosmology

Abstract: We discuss the expansions used in spin foam cosmology. We point out that already at the one-vertex level, arbitrarily complicated amplitudes contribute and discuss the geometric asymptotics of the five simplest ones. We discuss what type of consistency conditions would be required to control the expansion. We show that the factorization of the amplitude originally considered is best interpreted in topological terms. We then consider the next-higher term in the graph expansion. We demonstrate the tension betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy amounts to the straightforward computation of spin foam transition amplitudes for boundary states that admit an interpretation in terms of homogeneous universes, and their re-writing in terms of an effective Hamiltonian constraint equation to be compared with the one of homogeneous GR. Beside technical aspects (see for example [49] for a critical analysis), the main differences stem from a change in perspective. While in GFT condensate cosmology one tries to extract an effective hydrodynamic description for the collective observables describing a large number of microscopic spin network degrees of freedom, here the focus is on the spin network degrees of freedom themselves and their fundamental quantum dynamics.…”
Section: Discussion: Answers To Frequently Asked Questions and Relmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy amounts to the straightforward computation of spin foam transition amplitudes for boundary states that admit an interpretation in terms of homogeneous universes, and their re-writing in terms of an effective Hamiltonian constraint equation to be compared with the one of homogeneous GR. Beside technical aspects (see for example [49] for a critical analysis), the main differences stem from a change in perspective. While in GFT condensate cosmology one tries to extract an effective hydrodynamic description for the collective observables describing a large number of microscopic spin network degrees of freedom, here the focus is on the spin network degrees of freedom themselves and their fundamental quantum dynamics.…”
Section: Discussion: Answers To Frequently Asked Questions and Relmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very coarse states would correspond to homogeneous configurations, finer states would describe inhomogeneities. Indeed, in the context of loop quantum cosmology [52], there are different suggestions on how the kinematics and dynamics can be obtained from the full theory [35,53,54] and how to include corrections from inhomogeneities, with Hellmann [54] discussing the (cylindrical) consistency conditions for the truncation of a given theory to homogeneous degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Summary Open Issues and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these results the asymptotic behaviour of several observables attached to a single weight was obtained in the BC model [44][45][46][47], as well as in the new models [48,49]. It is, however, unlikely that these type of calculations truly give information on any kind of general relativity limit, see for example the discussion in [50][51][52][53]. The behaviour of the entire state sum has remained largely unstudied, the exception being the results of [54], which indicate that some of the desirable geometric properties are lost once the entire state sum is considered, in particular the geometries that occur semi-classically are flat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%