2022
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2029398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectant management for umbilical artery thrombosis: a report of two cases and literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, fetal protection should be considered for fetuses with very low gestational age, whereas urgent delivery is preferred for fetuses with higher gestational age to avert unnecessary fetal loss. For patients with UAT and good maternal and fetal status, particularly the preterm group with an urgent need to extend the pregnancy, expectant management with ultrasound screening and close fetal monitoring may be an alternative to emergent delivery [14], as seen in our case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, fetal protection should be considered for fetuses with very low gestational age, whereas urgent delivery is preferred for fetuses with higher gestational age to avert unnecessary fetal loss. For patients with UAT and good maternal and fetal status, particularly the preterm group with an urgent need to extend the pregnancy, expectant management with ultrasound screening and close fetal monitoring may be an alternative to emergent delivery [14], as seen in our case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Umbilical artery thrombosis (UAT) can affect nutrient supply to the fetus, and even endanger the safety of the fetus, resulting in the risk of intrauterine fetal death (1)(2)(3). The incidence of UAT is reported to be between 0.025% and 0.045%, but can be up to 0.4% in high risk pregnancies (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%