1995
DOI: 10.1366/0003702953964499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectation Minimum (EM): A New Principle for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems in Photothermal Science

Abstract: The expectation-minimum (EM) principle is a new strategy for recovering robust solutions to the ill-posed inverse problems of photothermal science. The expectation-minimum principle uses the addition of well-characterized random noise to a model basis to be fitted to the experimental response by linear minimization or projection techniques. The addition of noise to the model basis improves the conditioning of the basis by many orders of magnitude. Multiple projections of the data onto the basis in the presence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…quasi-uniqueness) of the recovered solutions is ensured when u is set at or above the relative standard deviation in h( t) , assuming that the experimental random error is constant and time invariant. This has also been shown for linear regularization techniques (46)(47)(48). In this work, (T = 0.03 (3%) was used because it is set just above the maximum level of relative rms error (random plus bias) observed in the experimental data, as analyzed by the data residuals associated with the fit of the model to the data (see below).…”
Section: N Error Analysis and Evaluation Of The Fit Of The Model To mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…quasi-uniqueness) of the recovered solutions is ensured when u is set at or above the relative standard deviation in h( t) , assuming that the experimental random error is constant and time invariant. This has also been shown for linear regularization techniques (46)(47)(48). In this work, (T = 0.03 (3%) was used because it is set just above the maximum level of relative rms error (random plus bias) observed in the experimental data, as analyzed by the data residuals associated with the fit of the model to the data (see below).…”
Section: N Error Analysis and Evaluation Of The Fit Of The Model To mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The depth profile reconstructions reported in this work arise from solutions to an ill-posed problem, which is intractable without some form of regularization (47). In the case of the stochastic algorithm, EM-NNLS (30), used in this work, such regularization is provided by the noise that is added to the basis set and which behaves as a nonlinear regularization parameter (30,48). Although a detailed discussion may be found elsewhere (47)(48)(49), the effect of regulaxization is to impose a filtering (smoothing) on the reconstruction of q(x), which stabilizes its recovery, providing a quasi-unique, albeit broadened or filtered, solution to J3q 5.…”
Section: N Error Analysis and Evaluation Of The Fit Of The Model To mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this and our previous works, 26,27 we have used two different algorithms to evaluate G . The ® rst, zero-order…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 is provided by the expectation-minimum principle. 26,27 This algorithm uses seeding of the matrix G e with white noise of known, constant variance. A regularized solution is recovered by averaging a fam ily of individual solutions recovered in the presence of noise on G :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%