According to the placebo-reward hypothesis, placebo is a reward-anticipation process that increases midbrain dopamine (DA) levels. Reward-based learning processes, such as reinforcement learning, involves a large part of the DA-ergic network that is also activated by the placebo intervention. Given the neurochemical overlap between placebo and reward learning, we investigated whether verbal instructions in conjunction with a placebo intervention are capable of enhancing reward learning in healthy individuals by using a monetary reward-based reinforcement-learning task. Placebo intervention was performed with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. In a randomized, triple-blind, cross-over study we investigated this cognitive placebo effect in healthy individuals by manipulating the participants' perceived uncertainty about the intervention's efficacy. Volunteers in the purportedly low-and high-uncertainty conditions earned more money, responded more quickly and had a higher learning rate from monetary rewards relative to baseline. Participants in the purportedly highuncertainty conditions showed enhanced reward learning, and a model-free computational analysis revealed a higher learning rate from monetary rewards compared to the purportedly low-uncertainty and baseline conditions. Our results indicate that the placebo response is able to enhance reward learning in healthy individuals, opening up exciting avenues for future research in placebo effects on other cognitive functions.Observational and interventional approaches are concomitantly used to study brain networks and their putative contributions to certain brain functions 1 . While the former approach is necessary to characterize the spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity, the interventional approach constitutes an important step towards facilitating causal inference 2 . Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) interventions offer the possibility to induce transient perturbations in intact human brain networks by using electromagnetic induction or electrical current, while minimizing possible health risks, financial costs and ethical concerns [3][4][5] . Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is the most frequently employed research tool in studies that use electrical current as a NIBS technique 3 . It passes constant, low intensity current between two or more electrodes attached to the intact scalp. Depending on the polarity, the externally applied constant current can increase or decrease the spontaneous firing rate (i.e., cortical excitability) of the stimulated brain regions by depolarizing or hyperpolarizing resting membrane potentials 3 . Although most of the commercially available and certified tDCS devices are equipped with a double-blind operation mode, a large number of studies still use a single-blind study design, no blinding at all or inadequate blinding 6 . In these cases, the impact of intentional and unconscious preferences, bias and expectations of the participants as well as of the researchers can possibly lead to an overestima...