2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0332-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition

Abstract: Background Inhibitory control, a key modulatory component of cognition guiding strategy and behaviour, can be affected by diverse contingencies. We explore here the effect of expectation of reward over behavioural adjustment in a Stop Signal Task modulated by reward. We hypothesize that cognitive control is modulated by different expectation of the reward. Methods Participants were allocated to two groups differing in their degree of knowledge in what to expect from rew… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In healthy adults, being able to anticipate reward improves cognitive control and goal-directed behavior (Braver et al, 2014). This effect holds across different cognitive control functions including response inhibition (Herrera et al, 2019), conflict resolution (Krebs, Boehler, & Woldorff, 2010;Padmala & Pessoa, 2011), as well as working memory (Jimura, Locke, & Braver, 2010;Locke & Braver, 2008). One commonly used conflict resolution task is the Stroop task, in which participants have to name the ink color of a color word, while ignoring its semantic meaning (e.g., the word red printed in blue font) (Stroop, 1935).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In healthy adults, being able to anticipate reward improves cognitive control and goal-directed behavior (Braver et al, 2014). This effect holds across different cognitive control functions including response inhibition (Herrera et al, 2019), conflict resolution (Krebs, Boehler, & Woldorff, 2010;Padmala & Pessoa, 2011), as well as working memory (Jimura, Locke, & Braver, 2010;Locke & Braver, 2008). One commonly used conflict resolution task is the Stroop task, in which participants have to name the ink color of a color word, while ignoring its semantic meaning (e.g., the word red printed in blue font) (Stroop, 1935).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manipulations of reward expectations appeared to trigger different cognitive control strategies, which may explain the placebo and nocebo effects on inhibition (Herrera, Van Meerbeke, Speranza et al, 2019). Jager, Dam, Van Der Mierden et al (2020) found that expectations of negative feedback reduced cognitive flexibility, which may account for the nocebo effect on shifting function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manipulations of reward expectations appeared to trigger different cognitive control strategies, which may explain the placebo and nocebo effects on inhibition (Herrera, Van Meerbeke, Speranza et al ., 2019). Jager, Dam, Van Der Mierden et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the degree to which proactive inhibitory control mechanisms are modulated by motivational factors (e.g., reward, punishment) remains poorly understood. Recent behavioral studies have shown that reward motivation can improve inhibitory control processes (Chiew and Braver, 2014 ; Herrera et al, 2014 , 2019 ; Giuffrida et al, 2023 ), and, in line with modulation of proactive inhibitory control, reward incentives can enhance transient neural responses of early attention to go stimuli prior to inhibitory cues (Schevernels et al, 2015 ; Langford et al, 2016 ). However, these studies did not examine the impact of motivation on the predictive neurocognitive processes supporting inhibitory performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%