Expectations of choice: an exploration of how social context informs gendered occupation

Abstract

Purpose Occupational choice describes the process that leads to occupational engagement as a result of intrinsic and extrinsic influences. There has been a considerable amount of research concerning occupational choice, gender and adolescence. However, this has largely focused on the areas of career choice and engagement in risky health behaviours. This paper aims to expand on the literature by providing a broader scope of occupation more aligned with the concept associated with occupational science. Furthering this, the researcher aims to examine the influence of gender as an extrinsic influence on occupational choice. The researcher aims to explore how contextual influences inform gendered occupational choice. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory qualitative approach was used in the current study. Incorporating photographs as a means of elucidating conversation during the interview process, photo-elicitation interview techniques were used as part of the data collection. This involved using a collection of photographs to prompt participants to discuss their interpretations of various occupations. Six adolescent boys and girls aged 11-14 years participated in the study. Participants were recruited from mixed-gendered sports clubs in the West of Ireland. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. An occupational justice perspective was used to interpret the data. Findings Responses suggest that gender informs occupational choice through different mechanisms. These included social systems, physical and institutional opportunities as well as expectations participants held of themselves and others they considered to be within their social grouping. Social systems included groups such as friends and family. The ease of access to physical and institutional resources was another factor that informed choice. Participants projected views of expectations they perceived others held for them informed how the participants made their choices. These factors varied across gender. Despite opportunities being available to both sexes, choices were often restricted to particular occupations. Originality/value The findings suggest that factors informing the occupational choices of adolescents included a combination of intrinsic factors such as gender and perspectives, as well as external factors including peers, family and opportunities in the local community. Practical applications of this involve acknowledging and further understanding the contextually situated nature of choice to provide more equitable practice. The results of the study may provide more insight into the factors that enable and inhibit occupation. A further understanding of these influences can redirect how we view adolescent occupations in a way that promotes health.

Shifting identities: exploring occupational identity for those in recovery from an eating disorder

“…789-792). Echoing recent research, revealing the power of social influences, which can inform, and also constrain choice (Brennan and Gallagher, 2017).…”

A scoping review exploring ‘opportunity’ in occupational science: Possibilities for conceptual development

“…Overlooking the concept of opportunity as an explanandum is a limitation in the current theorization, given that opportunity is implicitly referenced and identified as necessary for just outcomes (Hammell, 2016(Hammell, , 2017aPereira, 2017;Rivas-Quarneti et al, 2018;Stadnyk et al, 2010;Whiteford & Pereira, 2012;. The importance of opportunity as a concept was raised by multiple authors whose papers did not fit the criteria for our review (Angell, 2014;Bailliard, 2016;Brennan & Gallagher, 2017;Hammell, 2015Hammell, , 2017bHammell & Beagan, 2017;Lorenzo, 2004;Thomas et al, 2017). Since occupational scientists have not intentionally theorized opportunity, it leaves a gap in fully understanding how just outcomes may be achieved.…”

Career Planning Indicators of Successful TVET Entrepreneurs

“…The findings are also parallel to a study conducted by Holland [7], which shows that a conventional person's need for career planning is high because their career choice does not coincide with their own potential. This identifies how environment affects choice, but ultimately the locus of control and the determining factor is the individual [48,49]. Therefore, they are able to plan their career because the institution where they are studying helps to provide career paths, especially entrepreneurship in their study system.…”