2006
DOI: 10.1002/art.21856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectations of recovery from revision knee replacement

Abstract: Objective. To evaluate outcome expectations of patients undergoing revision total knee replacement (TKR) and to examine personal factors, patient functioning, previous experiences with knee replacement surgery, concerns about surgery, and general health as predictors of expectations. Methods. Revision TKR patients (n ‫؍‬ 184, 54% women; mean age 69 years) completed a questionnaire up to 2 weeks before surgery. This included demographics, experience with previous knee surgery, concerns about surgery, the Life O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to what has been reported in Journal of Surgical Oncology Defined as patients having an incomplete primary excision at a peripheral hospital prior to their definitive surgery at a study center. other surgical populations, patients' expectations were generally high, with almost 50% of our cohort expecting a short, uncomplicated recovery and no difficulty performing daily activities post-operatively [19,28,29,33,34]. However, we also found that a significant percentage of our patients did not know what to expect regarding their postoperative recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to what has been reported in Journal of Surgical Oncology Defined as patients having an incomplete primary excision at a peripheral hospital prior to their definitive surgery at a study center. other surgical populations, patients' expectations were generally high, with almost 50% of our cohort expecting a short, uncomplicated recovery and no difficulty performing daily activities post-operatively [19,28,29,33,34]. However, we also found that a significant percentage of our patients did not know what to expect regarding their postoperative recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Outcome expectations have been defined as the ''physical, social and self-evaluative expectations one holds for the outcome of one's behaviors'' [18], and have been linked to post-operative analgesic use, rehabilitation compliance, functional recovery, and satisfaction with outcomes [16,19]. In general, patients achieve better health outcomes when they have positive, realistic outcome expectations (high outcome expectancy) and when they believe they can successfully execute the behaviors needed to generate these outcomes (high self-efficacy) [16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen different clinical assessment tools modified for the evaluation of expectations were identified (Table 3) [2, 13,15,19,23,25,33,39,40,43,44,46,61,65]. All of the modified instruments were designed for self-administration by patients.…”
Section: Expectation Measures For Which Development and Validity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the modified instruments were designed for self-administration by patients. Excluding the modified Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire [13,33,40,65], all of the instruments were only used in a single study identified in our review. Twenty studies used custom questionnaires developed by the authors to assess patient expectations without any explicit description of the methodology, rationale, or source instrument behind their development [3, 5, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 22, 27, 28, 30-32, 45, 52, 53, 57, 64, 66, 68].…”
Section: Expectation Measures For Which Development and Validity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Few studies have been directed towards identifying the patient level predictors of higher expectations with surgery. 20 Factors such as geographic location, 21 older age, 22 and male gender 22 have been identified as predictors of higher patient expectations. We found no relationship between patient demographic data such as age, gender, body mass index, and comorbidity and expectations of contralateral TJR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%