2003
DOI: 10.1177/1077559503254137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectations Test: Trauma Scales for Sexual Abuse, Physical Abuse, Exposure to Family Violence, and Posttraumatic Stress

Abstract: Gully's 2000 Expectations Test was developed as a tool to use with children ages 4 through 17 to measure social information processing. Prior research suggested it could help identify abused and emotionally traumatized children. Results from regression analyses were used to develop four scales that could be calculated simply. Prior research demonstrated excellent interrater reliability for the variables from the Expectations Test used in the regression analyses. The minimum Cronbach's alpha for any scale is .7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Answers are summed to reflect the child’s expectations for certain emotions and experiences in social situations. Psychometric evaluation reveals good reliability and internal consistency, sensitivity and specificity data for common trauma histories, and some evidence for sensitivity to therapeutic change (Gully, 2000, 2003). We report expectation scores for a subset of experiences relevant to child physical abuse that were not redundant with the TSCC scales (i.e., scared, physical harm, personal efficacy in interpersonal situations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Answers are summed to reflect the child’s expectations for certain emotions and experiences in social situations. Psychometric evaluation reveals good reliability and internal consistency, sensitivity and specificity data for common trauma histories, and some evidence for sensitivity to therapeutic change (Gully, 2000, 2003). We report expectation scores for a subset of experiences relevant to child physical abuse that were not redundant with the TSCC scales (i.e., scared, physical harm, personal efficacy in interpersonal situations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical abuse ranges from very severe violence (threatened or assaulted with a weapon, intentionally burned, punched with a closed fist, kicked, thrown around the room, head banged against the wall) to mild violence (being tied up, being denied food or medical care, being held under water; Gully, 2003;Whitbeck & Simons, 1990). Sexual abuse is generally measured by verbal requests for sexual favors, being touched sexually against one's will, and being forced to engage in sexual activities against one's will (Whitbeck & Simons, 1990).…”
Section: Maltreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases in which family counseling is used for families of runaway/homeless females, particular attention should be paid to repairing mother-daughter relationships as means of preventing unwanted pregnancy. Considering previous research indicating that serious family dysfunction may escalate into physical abuse or other forms of maltreatment [38] and that physically and sexually abused youth exhibit more severe runaway behaviors [24], it was surprising that neither physical nor sexual abuse by one's father significantly predicted pregnancy. It was further unexpected that experiencing physical abuse by one's mother was associated with decreased risk of pregnancy.…”
Section: Predictors Of Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%