2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01678.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period—obstetric outcome when dates mismatch

Abstract: Objective  To analyse the association between fetal size at time of dating ultrasound and risk for preterm delivery and small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) birth and to evaluate if timing of ultrasound, that is before 14 weeks of gestation or after 16 weeks affects this association. Design  Retrospective cohort study. Setting  Ultrasound departments of Ultragyn, Stockholm, Sweden. Population  A total of 28 776 singleton pregnancies dated between 1998 and 2004. Methods  Obstetric outcome was assessed through linkag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
45
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16,17 Studies have, however, shown detectable differences in biparietal diameter already at the end of the first trimester with respect to fetal sex, 18 -20 maternal smoking, 21,22 and early growth restriction. 23 Thus, it is plausible that second-trimester ultrasound dating may lead to systematic errors in estimation of gestational age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 Studies have, however, shown detectable differences in biparietal diameter already at the end of the first trimester with respect to fetal sex, 18 -20 maternal smoking, 21,22 and early growth restriction. 23 Thus, it is plausible that second-trimester ultrasound dating may lead to systematic errors in estimation of gestational age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of GA by ultrasonographic biometry is recognized as being more reliable than GA-LMP [9,18,30] mostly because estimation based on the LMP assumes that conception occurs on day 14 of the cycle, whereas the time point of ovulation during the menstrual cycle varies greatly. Indeed, several studies have shown that estimation of GA based on LMP, even when the recall is certain, is unreliable [4,11,28,32].…”
Section: Ga (Weeks)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, it is generally accepted that estimation of GA by ultrasound (US) in early pregnancy is more precise and reliable than dating based on the last menstrual period (LMP) [9,14,18,30], and US fetometry has become the exclusive means of pregnancy dating in Sweden during the past decades [13]. Consequently, if the estimated date of delivery according to the LMP (GA-LMP) and according to US examination (GA-US) differs, obstetricians rely entirely on the latter [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Principalement dans des populations issues de PMA, pour lesquelles la DDG est connue, il a été montré qu'une LCC plus petite qu'attendue était associée à un risque majoré de retard de croissance voire de mort foetale in utero et, à l'inverse, qu'une LCC plus grande qu'attendue était associée à un risque accru de macrosomie, de disproportion foeto-pelvienne et de dystocie (NP3) [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Il n'y a toutefois à ce jour pas de consensus sur la gestion de telles discordances.…”
Section: Discordance Entre Longueur Cranio-caudale Mesurée Et Longueuunclassified