2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2010.00370.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expected Mispricing: The Joint Influence of Accounting Transparency and Investor Base

Abstract: We examine how accounting transparency and investor base jointly affect financial analysts' expectations of mispricing (i.e., expectations of stock price deviations from fundamental value). Within a range of transparency, these two factors interactively amplify analysts' expectations of mispricing—analysts expect a larger positive deviation when a firm's disclosures more transparently reveal income‐increasing earnings management and the firm's most important investors are described as transient institutional i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(191 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We follow prior research (e.g., Johnson et al., ; Francis et al., ; Elliott et al., ; Bhattacharya et al., ; and Ecker et al., ) and use the variation in discretionary current accruals to measure earnings quality . This measure captures the intuition that quality of accruals and, consequently, of earnings is decreasing in the magnitude of accruals estimation errors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We follow prior research (e.g., Johnson et al., ; Francis et al., ; Elliott et al., ; Bhattacharya et al., ; and Ecker et al., ) and use the variation in discretionary current accruals to measure earnings quality . This measure captures the intuition that quality of accruals and, consequently, of earnings is decreasing in the magnitude of accruals estimation errors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In examining the relationship between earnings quality and the analyst propensity to jointly issue cash flow and earnings forecasts, we follow previous literature (e.g., Johnson et al., ; Francis et al., ; and Elliott et al., ) and use the variation in discretionary current accruals (McNichols, ) as our main earnings quality measure. We find that compared to stand‐alone EPS forecasts, the variation in current discretionary accruals is 41% lower when analysts issue cash flow estimates together with EPS forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, unlike archival studies, our experimental approach does not rely on market prices to draw inferences about investors' underlying estimates of fundamental value. This is advantageous as both theory and empirical evidence indicate that price and fundamental value can substantially and systematically diverge (Lee, Myers, and Swaminathan 1999;Lee 2001;Abreu and Brunnermeier 2002;Bosch-Domènech, Montalvo, Nagel, and Satorra 2002;Elliott, Krische, and Peecher 2010). Our experimental approach contributes to the accounting literature by cleanly disentangling the intended from the unintended effects of CSR performance on investors' beliefs about a firm's fundamental value and the price they are willing to pay to invest in the stock of that firm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accounting researchers may also motivate these investigations by citing the importance of individual investors in capital markets, including the U.S. capital market (e.g., Koonce and Lipe 2010) or particular components of the U.S. capital market (e.g., Jiang et al 2016). Individual investors are presumed to be relatively unsophisticated, and analytic models and empirical analyses of investor sentiment suggest that the presence of less sophisticated investors can affect market prices and expectations (e.g., De Long et al 1990a, 1990bElliott et al 2010;Hirshleifer et al 2006;Kumar and Lee 2006;Shleifer and Vishny 1997). reported history (i.e., nonretirement). To assess the reasonability of the sample, I benchmark this MTurk sample against national samples of financial capability skills in the United States (FINRA Foundation 2009a, 2009b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%