2014
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.20578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expected time complexity of the auction algorithm and the push relabel algorithm for maximum bipartite matching on random graphs

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In this paper we analyze the expected time complexity of the auction algorithm for the matching problem on random bipartite graphs. We first prove that if for every non-maximum matching on graph G there exist an augmenting path with a length of at most 2l + 1 then the auction algorithm converges after N ·l iterations at most. Then, we prove that the expected time complexity of the auction algorithm for bipartite matching on random graphs with edge probability p = w.h.p. This time complexity is equal t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M factor can be easily improved to N if players have IDs, which can be achieved distributely [24]. If some limited communication is allowed, more sophisticated algorithms to distributedly compute the matching are possible, based on gossip, message passing, or auctions [36], [37]. These algorithms do not need a consensus phase, eliminating the N factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M factor can be easily improved to N if players have IDs, which can be achieved distributely [24]. If some limited communication is allowed, more sophisticated algorithms to distributedly compute the matching are possible, based on gossip, message passing, or auctions [36], [37]. These algorithms do not need a consensus phase, eliminating the N factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following known result on perfect matching in random bipartite graphs was proven by Erdős and Rényi in [16]: The next theorem proven in [17] shows that for random bipartite graphs with p ≥ …”
Section: A Expected Number Of Iterations Of the Matching Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Theorem (Naparstek and Leshem [39]). Let G = (U, V, E) be a random bipartite graph with |U | = |V | = N and p ≥ (1+ ) log(N ) N .…”
Section: B Expected Number Of Iterations Of Fast Matching Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next theorem proven in [39] shows that for random bipartite graphs with p ≥ (1+ ) log(N ) N the number of iterations until the convergence of the algorithm is less than cN log(N )…”
Section: B Expected Number Of Iterations Of Fast Matching Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation