2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.590963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expense Misreporting in Nonprofit Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, previous studies have concluded that the incentives to misreport in an informational return can result in significant discrepancies between actual and reported amounts. As an example, Krishnan et al (2006) presented evidence of manipulation in program ratios as reported in Form 990s, while amounts reported in the audited financial statements were found to be more reliable. Specifically, they found that many nonprofit organizations receiving public support reported zero fundraising activities, 40% of which were determined to be misreporting those activities as program activities.…”
Section: Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, previous studies have concluded that the incentives to misreport in an informational return can result in significant discrepancies between actual and reported amounts. As an example, Krishnan et al (2006) presented evidence of manipulation in program ratios as reported in Form 990s, while amounts reported in the audited financial statements were found to be more reliable. Specifically, they found that many nonprofit organizations receiving public support reported zero fundraising activities, 40% of which were determined to be misreporting those activities as program activities.…”
Section: Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Second, the level of assurance associated with the external audits and the transparency associated with Single Audit hospitals lends credibility to our measure of charity care. Unlike 990 data, which does not come with the same assurance afforded by an external audit and which has been determined to be subject to manipulation (e.g., Krishnan et al 2006), data from Single Audit reports implies potentially greater accuracy.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They indicate that differences exist because: (1) GAAP requires the consolidation of related entities that may have separate tax-exempt status; (2) there are differences between some 990 reporting rules and nonprofit GAAP; and (3) there is a lack of understanding on the part of some preparers that results in failure to comply with 990 instructions. In fact, research documents that large organizations (Froelich & Knoepfle, 1996;Keating et al, 2008), those that pay executives relatively high salaries (Keating et al, 2008); and organizations that pay an external accountant (Krishnan et al, 2006;Keating et al, 2008) are more likely prepare high quality 990s.…”
Section: Issues With Form 990mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Krishnan et al . 29 identify that many charities report zero fundraising costs despite engaging in fundraising activities. They also document that nonprofi t hospitals in California report greater programme spending on their Form 990s than they do in state regulatory fi lings, which are subject to audit by the State government.…”
Section: Is Greater Accountability Needed?mentioning
confidence: 99%