Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1958746.1958757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience building non-functional requirement models of a complex industrial architecture

Abstract: In this paper, we report on our experience with the application of validated models to assess performance, reliability, and adaptability of a complex mission critical system that is being developed to dynamically monitor and control the position of an oil-drilling platform. We present real-time modeling results that show that all tasks are schedulable. We performed stochastic analysis of the distribution of tasks execution time as a function of the number of system interfaces. We report on the variability of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adaptability modeling approach was performed by generating Design Structure Matrixes (DSMs) from the Enterprise Architect (EA) documentation tool and from the actual DPS prototype source code. This paper extends a previous publication [20] by providing a black-box reliability analysis and extending the adaptability analysis taking into account design structure. Furthermore, the lessons learned were extended with recent insights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The adaptability modeling approach was performed by generating Design Structure Matrixes (DSMs) from the Enterprise Architect (EA) documentation tool and from the actual DPS prototype source code. This paper extends a previous publication [20] by providing a black-box reliability analysis and extending the adaptability analysis taking into account design structure. Furthermore, the lessons learned were extended with recent insights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%