2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience in plasma production of hollow ceramic microspheres with required wall thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The porosity of the ESP particle was ~ 45% measured by Archimedes’ method, 35 slightly lower than that of the HOSP particle (52%) 46 . Since two particles had similar size and density, as well as the same spray parameters, it was reasonable to assume that they have similar in‐flight speed and surface temperature in the plasma jet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The porosity of the ESP particle was ~ 45% measured by Archimedes’ method, 35 slightly lower than that of the HOSP particle (52%) 46 . Since two particles had similar size and density, as well as the same spray parameters, it was reasonable to assume that they have similar in‐flight speed and surface temperature in the plasma jet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the sake of completeness, however, it should be noted that many other materials, either natural or synthetic, can be used to fabricate Ms&Mb for different applications. A few examples include stainless steel microspheres (for conductive spacers, shock absorption, and micromotor bearings [ 5 ]); metallic nickel hollow microspheres (enhanced magnetic properties; Ni/Pt bimetallic microbubbles have potential applications in portable hydrogen generation systems, due to catalytic properties [ 6 ]); single-crystal ferrite microspheres (for applications not only as magnetic materials but also in ferrofluid technology and in biomedical fields, e.g., biomolecular separations, cancer diagnosis and treatment, magnetic resonance imaging [ 7 ]); single-crystal semiconductor microspheres (for active WGM resonators [ 8 ]); ceramic ZrO 2 hollow microspheres (for thermal applications) [ 9 ]. Glass, polymer, ceramic, metal solid and hollow microspheres are commercially available; there is a wide choice of quality, sphericity (Sphericity was defined in 1935 by the geologist H. Wadell, with reference to quartz particles ( J. Geology 1935, 43 , 250) as the ratio of the surface area of a sphere (with the same volume as the given particle) to the surface area of the particle), uniformity, particle size and particle size distribution, to allow the optimal choice for each unique application.…”
Section: Materials and Fabrication Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to other types of microspheres, like plastic or hollow glass, SGMs possess a high density, approximately 2.2 g/cc, for borosilicate, 2.5 g/cc for soda-lime, and 4.49 g/cc for barium titanate glass spheres. SGMs have high crushing strength making them suitable for high stress applications where microspheres are exposed to lots of stress during processing or implementation [18,[49][50][51].…”
Section: Sgmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• They supply colour consistency from all viewing angles. • They improve chemical endurance and chipping strength thanks to the glass hardness, and • They supply a durable, non-deformable spacer particles for bond line applications [50][51].…”
Section: Sgmsmentioning
confidence: 99%