1955
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.18004317810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience in the measurement of blood- and fluid-loss at operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 ''accurate and applicable'' and it remains the only commonly employed technique. 15,16 Other techniques, such as photometric assessment and radioactive labelling of albumin, are currently research tools only. 17,18 An unexpected finding was that the measured blood loss did not correlate with the fall in Hb where blood loss was <1500 mL.…”
Section: But This May Vary Between Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 ''accurate and applicable'' and it remains the only commonly employed technique. 15,16 Other techniques, such as photometric assessment and radioactive labelling of albumin, are currently research tools only. 17,18 An unexpected finding was that the measured blood loss did not correlate with the fall in Hb where blood loss was <1500 mL.…”
Section: But This May Vary Between Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, estimating the amount of blood lost by weighing (cf., Rains 1955, Spoerel and Heagy 1962, Moore et aI. 1965) and replacing it after the first 500 ml lost with equal amounts of stored or fresh whole blood has remained our conservative principle throughout these years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Various methods of measuring blood loss have been described, ranging from the visual guess (Davies and Topley, 1959) to the more elaborate colorimetric technique (Rains, 1955). A method which is simple and accurate in certain circumstances is that of soaking up all blood with swabs, weighing these at the end of the operation, and subtracting the weight of the dry swabs (Caceres and Whittembury, 1959).…”
Section: Measurement Of Blood Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%