This study evaluated whether olfactory preconditioning is functional in newborn rabbits and based on joined or independent memory of odorants. First, after exposure to odorants A+B, the conditioning of A led to high responsiveness to odorant B. Second, responsiveness to B persisted after amnesia of A. Third, preconditioning was also functional with two overlapping pairs of odorants (A+B and B+C) and amnesia of one odorant did not affect memory of the others. Thus, incidental pairing of odorants allows reinforcement of one odorant to implicitly reinforce the others, the bond then vanishes, and the memory of each element becomes independent.Although the mechanisms of first-order conditioning, based on simple association between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli (CS, US, respectively), are the focus of intense research, much less is known about higher-order conditioning in which a CS2 acquires significance by being paired with another CS (CS1) rather than a US. The CS2 is paired with CS1 before CS1+US association in sensory preconditioning, or after CS1+US association in second-order conditioning (e.g., Brogden 1939;Rescorla and Cunningham 1978;Rescorla 1980;Kehoe et al. 1981).The effectiveness of second-order conditioning has been shown recently in newborn rabbits. In this species, the mammary pheromone (MP) emitted by lactating females triggers orocephalic movements involved in neonatal localization and oral grasping of the nipples (Coureaud 2001;Schaal et al. 2003). It also promotes first-order conditioning acting as US; after a single and brief pairing with the MP, a novel odorant or mixture of odorants (CS1) becomes able to produce the conditioned grasping response 24-48 h later (Coureaud et al. , 2008Charra et al. 2013; for review, see Coureaud et al. 2010). Moreover, rabbit pups also learn to respond to CS2 when CS1+MP pairing is followed by CS1+CS2 pairing . In this second-order conditioning, amnesia of CS1 induced after recall of CS1 (by blockade of reconsolidation process) (see Coureaud et al. 2009a) leaves the CS2 memory intact . Thus, response to CS2 seems not to be based on the associative chain CS2 CS1 US/response but rather on a direct link CS2 US/response. This indicates in newborn rabbits that CS2 is independent of CS1 representation after second-order conditioning.Interestingly, behavioral differences were observed between second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning in adult mammals. Extinction of CS1 eliminates CS2 in sensory preconditioning only (Rizley and Rescorla 1972), suggesting that this learning process is primarily mediated by associative chains (CS2 CS1 response). However, the organization of associative memory in sensory preconditioning could be different in newborns as ontogenetic differences have been reported in rodents and humans, with better abilities in such paradigms in younger organisms (for reviews, see Spear and Kucharski 1984; Rovee-Collier and Giles 2010). Until now, chemosensory preconditioning was demonstrated in newborn rats (Cheslock et al. 2003), but the...