2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience of miscarriage: an interpretative phenomenological analysis

Abstract: ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to explore the experiences of those who have experienced miscarriage, focusing on men's and women's accounts of miscarriage.DesignThis was a qualitative study using a phenomenological framework. Following in-depth semistructured interviews, analysis was undertaken in order to identify superordinate themes relating to their experience of miscarriage.SettingA large tertiary-level maternity hospital in Ireland.ParticipantsA purposive sample of 16 participants, comprising 10… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
158
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
158
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not associated directly with app use, an additional and important finding from this study was the observation that women with a history of conception (p < 0.001) or who were actively seeing to get pregnant (p < 0.001) were more aware of the miscarriage rate (p < 0.001 in adjusted model). This is consistent with findings that the general population often underestimate the prevalence of miscarriage [37], and couples who have experienced miscarriage reported that they were not previously aware of the frequency in which it occurs in the people around them [69]. As miscarriage is not often discussed amongst the general population, it is likely that lived experience was responsible for the significant differences in response rates to this question in women who had conceived in the past or that were trying to conceive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Although not associated directly with app use, an additional and important finding from this study was the observation that women with a history of conception (p < 0.001) or who were actively seeing to get pregnant (p < 0.001) were more aware of the miscarriage rate (p < 0.001 in adjusted model). This is consistent with findings that the general population often underestimate the prevalence of miscarriage [37], and couples who have experienced miscarriage reported that they were not previously aware of the frequency in which it occurs in the people around them [69]. As miscarriage is not often discussed amongst the general population, it is likely that lived experience was responsible for the significant differences in response rates to this question in women who had conceived in the past or that were trying to conceive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In turn this may lead to a potentially increased likelihood of identifying risk factors and receiving antenatal care and surveillance following the detection of nonmodifiable risk factors. The results of this study suggest that the public awareness of stillbirth as a possible outcome of pregnancy is at least higher than the public awareness of the incidence of miscarriage although the incidence of miscarriage is considerably higher …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The period of three years was deemed suitable as miscarriage may be a traumatic event remembered several years after the loss (Gerber‐Epstein, Leichtentritt, & Benyamini, ). Participants’ stories were found to be detailed in previous studies on the topic using time frames of up to 6 years (MacWilliams et al, ; Meany et al, ). The exclusion criterion for parents was to have been a nurse in this ED setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' stories were found to be detailed in previous studies on the topic using time frames of up to 6 years (MacWilliams et al, 2016;Meany et al, 2017). The exclusion criterion for parents was to have been a nurse in this ED setting.…”
Section: Setting and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%