Experience Using the First Commercial Pad and Probe Style Formation Tester While Drilling Service Has Led To Value Creation at the Valhall Flank Development
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1 publication
References 0 publications
The ability to predict and determine formation pressure has been an important issue since the beginning of the industry. This issue has become of increasing importance in deepwater environments where the relationships between increasing pore pressures, formation fracture gradients, and ultimately wellbore stability becomes of critical importance and can determine whether or not a well can be successfully drilled to total depth (TD). Pre-drill modeling using seismic, structural, and geological data can be used to attempt to predict pore-pressure regimes. Traditional methods of monitoring pore pressure while drilling have relied on methods, such the use of drilling exponents, and other indirect methods, including the monitoring of connection gases and observations of cuttings shapes. These methods are often imprecise, and their success depends on the actual pore pressure generation mechanism. The development of new logging-while-drilling (LWD) technologies in recent years has added powerful new tools for the accurate determination of pore pressures and wellbore stability. LWD resistivity and sonic measurements can indicate overpressure in shale sequences. Measurements in hole sizes as large as 30 in. make it possible to establish compaction trends in deepwater wells from near the seabed. Direct measurements of formation pressure can now be made with LWD formation pressure tester tools, which can accurately measure formation pressures directly while drilling and, when used with pressure-while-drilling (PWD) measurements, can precisely manage effective mud weights in narrow mud weight window environments. Advanced LWD imaging technology can now be used to evaluate wellbore stress fields, which can enhance the understanding of hole stability and overpressure generation mechanisms. This paper reviews the use of LWD sensors for pore pressure analysis and uses case histories to demonstrate their application and value. Introduction Effective pore pressure prediction hinges on establishing the generation mechanisms that are active in the prospect. The generation mechanism dictates the selection of the appropriate prediction method and the information sources required for each technique. A number of generation mechanisms have been identified in the literature, which are broadly summarized in Table 1. The methods available for estimating pore pressures can also be subdivided into estimation techniques in argillaceous formations and estimation techniques in permeable formations. Argillaceous formations require the use of measurements that respond to changes in the porosity or the effective stress state of the rock, combined with an understanding of the expected compaction rate of the formations and a knowledge of any secondary compaction changes through unloading mechanisms. Compaction and porosity reduction varies from basin to basin and is controlled by properties, including the type of clay mineral, particle sizes and distribution, adsorbed cations, temperature, and pH. These properties influence the water content of argillaceous sediments under applied loads and contribute to the different porosity vs. depth relationships. Permeable formations require the direct measurement of formation pressures and knowledge of the pore fluid type, water, or hydrocarbons. In addition to the pore fluid type, a knowledge of the geological structures, formation relief, and faulting, as well as the identification of sealing formations are required to develop predictions and refine modeled estimates.
The ability to predict and determine formation pressure has been an important issue since the beginning of the industry. This issue has become of increasing importance in deepwater environments where the relationships between increasing pore pressures, formation fracture gradients, and ultimately wellbore stability becomes of critical importance and can determine whether or not a well can be successfully drilled to total depth (TD). Pre-drill modeling using seismic, structural, and geological data can be used to attempt to predict pore-pressure regimes. Traditional methods of monitoring pore pressure while drilling have relied on methods, such the use of drilling exponents, and other indirect methods, including the monitoring of connection gases and observations of cuttings shapes. These methods are often imprecise, and their success depends on the actual pore pressure generation mechanism. The development of new logging-while-drilling (LWD) technologies in recent years has added powerful new tools for the accurate determination of pore pressures and wellbore stability. LWD resistivity and sonic measurements can indicate overpressure in shale sequences. Measurements in hole sizes as large as 30 in. make it possible to establish compaction trends in deepwater wells from near the seabed. Direct measurements of formation pressure can now be made with LWD formation pressure tester tools, which can accurately measure formation pressures directly while drilling and, when used with pressure-while-drilling (PWD) measurements, can precisely manage effective mud weights in narrow mud weight window environments. Advanced LWD imaging technology can now be used to evaluate wellbore stress fields, which can enhance the understanding of hole stability and overpressure generation mechanisms. This paper reviews the use of LWD sensors for pore pressure analysis and uses case histories to demonstrate their application and value. Introduction Effective pore pressure prediction hinges on establishing the generation mechanisms that are active in the prospect. The generation mechanism dictates the selection of the appropriate prediction method and the information sources required for each technique. A number of generation mechanisms have been identified in the literature, which are broadly summarized in Table 1. The methods available for estimating pore pressures can also be subdivided into estimation techniques in argillaceous formations and estimation techniques in permeable formations. Argillaceous formations require the use of measurements that respond to changes in the porosity or the effective stress state of the rock, combined with an understanding of the expected compaction rate of the formations and a knowledge of any secondary compaction changes through unloading mechanisms. Compaction and porosity reduction varies from basin to basin and is controlled by properties, including the type of clay mineral, particle sizes and distribution, adsorbed cations, temperature, and pH. These properties influence the water content of argillaceous sediments under applied loads and contribute to the different porosity vs. depth relationships. Permeable formations require the direct measurement of formation pressures and knowledge of the pore fluid type, water, or hydrocarbons. In addition to the pore fluid type, a knowledge of the geological structures, formation relief, and faulting, as well as the identification of sealing formations are required to develop predictions and refine modeled estimates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Contact Info
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Product
Resources
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
