1981
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90045-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience with 130 polytetrafluoroethylene grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different reports have shown low infection rates, being patent for the short and the long term, and not requiring pre-clotting as the advantages of PTFE over older types (such as Dacron) (3,7). The greater need for temporary catheters in individuals receiving PTFEs, however, increases not only the costs but also the risk of infection, bleeding, and poor blood flow (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different reports have shown low infection rates, being patent for the short and the long term, and not requiring pre-clotting as the advantages of PTFE over older types (such as Dacron) (3,7). The greater need for temporary catheters in individuals receiving PTFEs, however, increases not only the costs but also the risk of infection, bleeding, and poor blood flow (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is composed of solid nodules of PTFE interconnected by minute fibrils, resulting in a highly porous fibrous matrix that allows fibrovascular ingrowth, collagen penetration and its incorporation into host tissue 1,3−5 . In addition, it shows resistance to infection, is not weakened by tissue enzymes 1,6 and is easily sutured to the surrounding tissue 6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent in vitro study reported that 5-0 PLG degraded more rapidly than 4-0 PLG 60) . PTFE was reported to have good resistance against infection and the action of tissue enzymes 61) . In the present study, degradation rates of PLG and PTFE did not appear to be adversely affected by 0.2% myrrh or Parodontax.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%