2007
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/2007/t128/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience with bulk tungsten test-limiters under high heat loads: melting and melt layer propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the effect is strongly increasing at lower magnetic field line to surface angles, one expects a higher saturation level for the sample geometry with a leading edge facing the full parallel plasma flux. This is supported by previous studies of sustained tungsten melting in TEXTOR where the replacement current through a melting tungsten limiter was compared to the Richardson current computed from measured surface temperatures [22]. Along the same line, the previous ASDEX Upgrade transient melt study [12] showed an ongoing increase of the ELM-related current excursions for the leading edge sample in contrast to the observations for the sloped sample.…”
Section: Melt Sample Surface Temperature and Replacement Currentsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As the effect is strongly increasing at lower magnetic field line to surface angles, one expects a higher saturation level for the sample geometry with a leading edge facing the full parallel plasma flux. This is supported by previous studies of sustained tungsten melting in TEXTOR where the replacement current through a melting tungsten limiter was compared to the Richardson current computed from measured surface temperatures [22]. Along the same line, the previous ASDEX Upgrade transient melt study [12] showed an ongoing increase of the ELM-related current excursions for the leading edge sample in contrast to the observations for the sloped sample.…”
Section: Melt Sample Surface Temperature and Replacement Currentsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Accurate quantification of the thermionic emission fraction will ultimately require both directly measured surface temperature and comparison to simulations, which also take into account a possible saturation of thermionic emission by space charge formation above the heated surface in presence of a magnetic field [45]. Indications for this effect were previously seen in melt studies at TEXTOR, where the current through an exposed tungsten test limiter probe was measured up to surface melt temperature [46]. Since the molten area can be estimated from the post-exposure melt pattern, a lower bound for the thermionic emission current density can be obtained from the net replacement current, providing a direct qualitative criterion to distinguish transient melting from sustained steady state melting.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although surface melting is observed during disruptions in Alcator C-Mod, a quantitative assessment is not available yet. Controlled experiments on melt layer behavior are mainly performed in TEXTOR using bulk W test limiters [21]. Spectroscopic measurements of the atomic tungsten flux from a hot W surface indicate that no enhancement of atomic tungsten release exceeding physical sputtering and normal thermal sublimation for temperatures below 3700 K occurs under the present experimental conditions.…”
Section: Erosion and Meltingmentioning
confidence: 87%