1981
DOI: 10.1177/155005948101200208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience with Nasopharyngeal Electrode Recording with Psychiatric Patients : A Clinical Note

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such skepticism is supported by earlier work (de Jesus and Masland 1970) demonstrating that out of 789 EEGs (495 of which were abnormal) only 7 tracings were found with an abnormal discharge confined to nasopharyngeal leads (0.9 % of all patients screened). Others have also reported that nasopharyngeal electrodes provide little or no additional information beyond standard scalp electrodes when used with psychiatric patients (Struve and Feigenbaum 1981). Moreover, nasopharyngeal leads are usually uncomfortable and would be difficult to place particularly in not fully cooperative psychiatric patients.…”
Section: Incidence Among ''Normal'' Control Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such skepticism is supported by earlier work (de Jesus and Masland 1970) demonstrating that out of 789 EEGs (495 of which were abnormal) only 7 tracings were found with an abnormal discharge confined to nasopharyngeal leads (0.9 % of all patients screened). Others have also reported that nasopharyngeal electrodes provide little or no additional information beyond standard scalp electrodes when used with psychiatric patients (Struve and Feigenbaum 1981). Moreover, nasopharyngeal leads are usually uncomfortable and would be difficult to place particularly in not fully cooperative psychiatric patients.…”
Section: Incidence Among ''Normal'' Control Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%