2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-019-01670-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experienced Severity of Imprisonment Among Fathers and Non-Fathers

Abstract: Objectives Even though 90% of the prison population is male, fatherhood among prisoners is an overlooked topic. Previous studies suggest that experienced severity of detention is different between fathers and non-fathers in prison because there is a unique deprivation strain related to fatherhood. There are criminological arguments and arguments in the legal context why we need more knowledge on the experience of detention by incarcerated fathers. Methods We studied longitudinal data of 785 males in pre-trial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this expectation, convicted individuals with a partner or married individuals were found to experience their detention as more severe (Crank & Brezina, 2013;Raaijmakers et al, 2017). However, other conventional ties such as parental status, educational level, employment status, and homelessness were not consistently found to be significantly related to the subjective severity of detention (Crank & Brezina, 2013;Raaijmakers et al, 2017;Reef & Dirkzwager, 2019). Perceived procedural justice is related to whether individuals feel heard and respected (Beijersbergen et al, 2016;Tyler, 2001).…”
Section: Social Economic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In line with this expectation, convicted individuals with a partner or married individuals were found to experience their detention as more severe (Crank & Brezina, 2013;Raaijmakers et al, 2017). However, other conventional ties such as parental status, educational level, employment status, and homelessness were not consistently found to be significantly related to the subjective severity of detention (Crank & Brezina, 2013;Raaijmakers et al, 2017;Reef & Dirkzwager, 2019). Perceived procedural justice is related to whether individuals feel heard and respected (Beijersbergen et al, 2016;Tyler, 2001).…”
Section: Social Economic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The latter is known to be a protective factor, as is having a solid social network (de Vogel et al, 2011). In addition, interventions in prisons for offenders to fulfil their role as fathers are associated with a higher quality of life during imprisonment and (indirectly) with protecting for recidivism (Reef et al, 2018;Reef & Dirkzwager, 2020). It could be recommended that in forensic mental health settings also this aspect is given more attention, through re-establishing contact in cases where children are the victims.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, fathers from this group were typically younger compared to fathers in the general population (31.3 vs 43.3). Reef and Dirkzwager (2020) found incarcerated fathers to be older than incarcerated nonfathers (36.5 vs 26.2). In addition, fathers in pretrial detention more often had an ethnic rather than a Dutch background (43% vs 27%), and were incarcerated more frequently than nonfathers (3.8 vs 2.2), but less for violent offenses and more for drug offenses.…”
Section: The Dutch Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it is not known whether fathers in prison differ from incarcerated nonfathers. There is evidence, however, that incarcerated fathers experience the severity of their imprisonment differently from incarcerated nonfathers (Reef & Dirkzwager, 2020). Fathers in prison have fewer adjustment issues, but missing their children can cause depression and anxiety.…”
Section: The Dutch Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%