2013
DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2013.838067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences in MOOCs: The Perspective of Students

Abstract: The aim of this article was to examine the experiences of students who have participated in massive open online courses (MOOCs). The results of an initial Google blog search were narrowed down to a sample of twenty-one blog posts, each of which was written by a MOOC participant. Content analysis was applied to identify and classify blog comments into emergent themes (e.g., the relevance of type and length of course, student demographics, instruction/instructor interactive styles, and factors that impacted on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1
26

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
47
1
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Such measures provide a paradigm for exploring participation in MOOCs as part of a community at the institutional level. Nevertheless, research using more open-ended measures was noticeably lacking [19].…”
Section: A Moocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such measures provide a paradigm for exploring participation in MOOCs as part of a community at the institutional level. Nevertheless, research using more open-ended measures was noticeably lacking [19].…”
Section: A Moocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, qualitative analysis can bring about a more detailed and nuanced understanding of learners that can be absent with a purely quantitative analysis. Previous qualitative studies which have employed thematic analysis within MOOCs have moved away from learner comments and have used learner blogs (Zutshi et al, 2013), MOOC videos (Hui, Yinjuan, Yingshan, & Zenong, 2014), online surveys (Baxter & Haycock, 2014), instructor observations (Grunewald et al, 2013), and twitter comments (Xia, 2014) to gain perspectives on MOOC learner behaviour and attitudes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They generate large amounts of learner data in the form of participant activity and interactions (Huang, Dasgupta, Ghosh, Manning, & Sanders, 2014;Seaton, Bergner, Chuang, Mitros, & Pritchard, 2014), learner survey results (Fini, 2009), external social media comments (Koutropoulos et al, 2014), interviews (Mackness, Waite, Roberts, & Lovegrove, 2013), focus groups (Firmin et al, 2014), observations (Grunewald et al, 2013), blog entries (Zutshi, O'Hare, & Rodafinos, 2013), and forum comments (Tucker, Pursel, & Divinsky, 2014). These data sources have been analyzed using a wide variety of different qualitative and quantitative methodologies and methods (Gallagher & Savage, 2016;Raffaghelli & Persico, 2014) to understand learner behaviour and frame course design, and determine MOOC success or failure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In addition, patterns of learners' usage of course material (i.e., clickstream data) have begun to be explored. 4 Still, little is known about the specific motivations and intentions of those who enroll in MOOCs and, particularly, the intentions of those who enroll in MOOCs involving highly technical engineering-related content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term, MOOC, has been defined as "any online educational course that is available at no or minimal cost, is open to a very large number of students, and for which the educational materials and resources are freely available online" (p. 218). 1 In general, MOOCs are free of the typical educational barriers of prerequisites, fees, and hard requirements for participation in the course, creating an investment-free option to access learning materials. 2 Indeed, those who enroll in MOOCs are free to enter and leave the course with little or no commitment to course activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%