2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2011.00159.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences of a nationwide web-based system: reporting dispensing errors in Swedish pharmacies

Abstract: Introducing a web-based system for reporting dispensing errors had an impact on quantity of reports and completeness. Time and patience was needed to implement the changes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The web-based error-reporting system was introduced in March 2004 17. In order to avoid effects pertaining to introduction problems, data from July 2004 and onward were analysed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The web-based error-reporting system was introduced in March 2004 17. In order to avoid effects pertaining to introduction problems, data from July 2004 and onward were analysed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reports are filed by the pharmacy staff. Until March 2004, a paper-based reporting system was in use, and in order to monitor and analyse errors more effectively, a web-based national reporting system was introduced in all Swedish pharmacies in 2004 17. This system allows for information on filed reports from each pharmacy, and those not reporting are approached by trained quality pharmacists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No outcome of interest Blaya 2010 Not about increasing clinical incidence reporting. Boyer 2009 No introduction of a new system Charpentier 2011 Not about how to increase clinical incident reporting. Costello 2007 One-site CBA Duckers 2009 A systematic review. Force 2006 Not enough data points to be included as an ITS Fukuda 2008 One-site CBA Grant 2007 One-site CBA Hall 2010 A systematic review. Haller 2007 Not experimental Jansma 2011 CBA with only one intervention and one control site. King 2010 A review paper. Kivlahan 2002 Not experimental Lehmann 2007 About drugs harm only McGraw 2011 Not about increasing the clinical incidence reporting. Mick 2007 Not experimental Munson 2010 No baseline data. Norden-Hagg 2012 Uncontrolled before and after study that could not be re-analysed as a time series Park 2008 One-...…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studies [Ordered By Study Id]mentioning
confidence: 99%