2016
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1115541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences of stigma in psychosis: A qualitative analysis of service users’ perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These identify the negative emotional and behavioral reactions of those experiencing internal and public stigma. Burke, Wood, Zabel, Clark, and Morrison () found that individuals who experience psychosis felt shame, fear, anxiety, hopelessness, and anger due to stigma. Participants described how negative past experiences contributed to social isolation and non‐disclosure of mental health problems, which are risk factors for worsening mental health problems, thus indicating a need to develop improved strategies to enable individuals with mental health problems to cope with stigma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These identify the negative emotional and behavioral reactions of those experiencing internal and public stigma. Burke, Wood, Zabel, Clark, and Morrison () found that individuals who experience psychosis felt shame, fear, anxiety, hopelessness, and anger due to stigma. Participants described how negative past experiences contributed to social isolation and non‐disclosure of mental health problems, which are risk factors for worsening mental health problems, thus indicating a need to develop improved strategies to enable individuals with mental health problems to cope with stigma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the reviewed articles were part of a larger study and these articles did not clearly state if the actual study had ethical approval or not. The reason for this could be that the actual qualitative study was part of a larger research project that had gained ethical approval for the whole project (Burke, Wood, Zabel, Clark, & Morrison, 2016; Kidd et al, 2016; Singh, Jakhaia, Amonashvili, & Winch, 2016). Two of the reviewed studies, one from Denmark (Bjørkedal, Torsting, & Møller, 2016) and one from the Netherlands (van Langen, Beentjes, van Gaal, der Sanden, & Goossens, 2016), indicated that they had consulted their ethics boards, which had replied that no ethical approval was needed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size varied between seven and 30 participants. In most of the articles, the authors discuss or mention the implications of a small sample size as a limitation for the research results (Bjørkedal et al, 2016; Blixen et al, 2016; Burke et al, 2016; de Jager et al, 2016; Jones et al, 2016; Landon, Shepherd, McGarry, Theadom, & Miller, 2016; Rhodes, Parrett, & Mason, 2016; Topor, Ljungqvist, & Strandberg, 2016), whereas other authors do not discuss this issue, even if fewer than 10 participants were interviewed (Singh et al, 2016; van Langen et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, the large geographical coverage of NHS trusts along with poor health and mobility in older adults doubles the difficulty clients experience in accessing this service. Finally, the combination of self-stigma, stigma from society and cultures (Burke et al 2015) makes it difficult for help-seeking and for outreach services to connect with them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%