Child Maltreatment in Residential Care 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57990-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences of Victimization by Peers and Staff in Residential Care for Children at Risk in Israel from an Ecological Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our expectation that family-style TRC, compared to larger TRC settings, was associated with a higher QoL, we did not find any differences between the two types of TRC settings regarding latent SC and QoL. This is not in line with previous literature on experienced SC (Attar-Schwartz, 2017; Leipoldt et al, 2019, 2021) and QoL (Damnjanović et al, 2012). An explanation for this finding is that the differences between the two groups of TRC characteristics are small, indicating that Norwegian TRC settings are more homogeneous in their organization and provided services, possibly due to state standards for TRC approvals and that a few specialized institutions were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to our expectation that family-style TRC, compared to larger TRC settings, was associated with a higher QoL, we did not find any differences between the two types of TRC settings regarding latent SC and QoL. This is not in line with previous literature on experienced SC (Attar-Schwartz, 2017; Leipoldt et al, 2019, 2021) and QoL (Damnjanović et al, 2012). An explanation for this finding is that the differences between the two groups of TRC characteristics are small, indicating that Norwegian TRC settings are more homogeneous in their organization and provided services, possibly due to state standards for TRC approvals and that a few specialized institutions were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…SC is considered to be a critical aspect for change or development of young people in TRC (e.g., Attar-Schwartz, 2017; Bastiaanssen et al, 2012; Hair, 2005; Huefner & Ainsworth, 2021; Lanctôt et al, 2016; Leipoldt et al, 2019; Mathys, 2017; Mathys et al, 2013; Moore et al, 2018; Souverein et al, 2013; Van der Helm, 2011, 2019; Ward, 2004). It can be defined as… the quality of the social and physical environment in terms of the provision of sufficient and necessary conditions for the physical and mental health, well-being, and personal growth of the residents, with respect for their human dignity and human rights as well as (if not restricted by judicial measures) their personal autonomy, aimed at participation in society (Stams & Van der Helm, 2017, p. 4).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the group in RC, accounting for the study's psychometric weak due to limited group sizes and poor generalizability, the absence of interaction between the group and the predictor may indicate that the higher insecurity and alexithymia of the adolescents in RC do not increase their likelihood of showing psychopathological problems more than in all other adolescents. In other words, attachment and alexithymia show similar connections to psychopathology in all these adolescent participants regardless of their group, and probably, adolescents in RC show more unfavourable outcomes due to the cumulative effects of other disadvantages they are exposed, for example, environmental and relational instability, and current adverse experiences inside the institutions (Attar‐Schwartz, 2017; Warner et al, 2017), or self‐perception as “diverse” from the not‐institutionalized counterpart (Calheiros et al, 2021). This call researchers for more investigate these variables' impact on the mental health of institutionalized adolescents, as well as focus more on those variables and processes related to their resilience (van Ijzendoorn et al, 2011), for example, positive relationships with the professional caregivers or peers (Costa et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Victimisation by peers is reported as a common occurrence by young people in residential care across Australia [1], Israel [15], the UK [4], and other European countries [16][17][18][19]. In Israel, for example, more than half of the 1,324 young people surveyed reported experiencing at least one physical violence act by coresidents in residential care in the preceding month (e.g., being grabbed, shoved, kicked, or punched) [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%