2020
DOI: 10.1177/1077801220963861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences With Help Seeking Among Non–Service-Engaged Survivors of IPV: Survivors’ Recommendations for Service Providers

Abstract: Engaging with formal intimate partner violence (IPV) services can buffer the impacts of violence and reduce future risk. Many survivors do not access or engage with such services. However, much of our knowledge related to the experiences and perspectives of IPV survivors comes from samples drawn from those seeking formal services. Qualitative interviews with 23 survivors of violence who are not currently engaged with formal IPV services were conducted, focused on the process and outcomes of choosing to seek he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rich data set can be roughly distilled into three distinct themes. First, although previous research has demonstrated that IPV survivors generally want non-judgmental empathic listening (Voth Schrag et al, 2020), it was particularly striking that this study arrived at the same finding because in this case, the desire for a listening ear arose amid serious violent assaults and when participants feared impending death. Even in these acute emergencies, survivors felt a deep longing for someone who would listen carefully; avoid blaming them for the harm inflicted by their intimate partners; and remain survivor-centered; that is, tailoring their response to what the survivor needed and wanted in the moment, rather than imposing what the network member personally thought best.…”
Section: Key Themes Across Clusterssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This rich data set can be roughly distilled into three distinct themes. First, although previous research has demonstrated that IPV survivors generally want non-judgmental empathic listening (Voth Schrag et al, 2020), it was particularly striking that this study arrived at the same finding because in this case, the desire for a listening ear arose amid serious violent assaults and when participants feared impending death. Even in these acute emergencies, survivors felt a deep longing for someone who would listen carefully; avoid blaming them for the harm inflicted by their intimate partners; and remain survivor-centered; that is, tailoring their response to what the survivor needed and wanted in the moment, rather than imposing what the network member personally thought best.…”
Section: Key Themes Across Clusterssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Importantly, the formal IPV-related service sector operates on a predominantly voluntary, survivor-driven model in which individual survivors have the choice to engage at the level and for the duration of services that works for them. As such, considering what factors influence survivors’ decisions related to services engagement is critical to create equity in services access and provision (Voth Schrag et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 7% of the general survivor population report a need for shelter services and only 21% ever obtain a PPO (Breiding et al, 2014). Little is known about the experiences of police intervention among survivors with varying experiences of abuse, relationship statuses, and formal help-seeking practices (Voth Schrag et al, 2021). Among survivors who never sought formal help from domestic violence services nor pursued a PPO, it remains unclear whether and how their safety needs get met if police intervention is their only source of formal intervention.…”
Section: Survivors’ History Of Formal Systems Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%