Experiences with integrative Indigenous and Western knowledge in water research and management: a systematic realist review of literature from Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States

Abstract

The implementation of Indigenous and Western knowledge systems in integrative water research and management is gaining prominence in the realm of academia, particularly in four countries with a shared, albeit different, history of British colonialism: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. While integrative water research in particular is gaining popularity, currently there is a gap in our understanding regarding where, when, why, how, and for whom this type of research has been successful. A systematic review method was used to identify peer-reviewed literature from each of the four countries and to understand where and when integrative water research projects were taking place. Then, we used a realist review method to synthesize and analyze the included peer-reviewed literature to determine why, how, and for whom this type of research has been successful, or not. Our systematic literature search provided 669 peer-reviewed articles from across the four countries, of which 97 met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Our findings indicate that the total number of integrative water research projects has been increasing since 2009, though these projects are largely concentrated within the realm of social science and conducted by non-Indigenous authors. Recognition of the value of Indigenous knowledge systems, coupled with an understanding that the use of Western knowledge systems alone has not remedied the disparity in access to safe water sources in Indigenous communities, has led researchers to recommend collaborative partnerships and governance structures as a potential pathway to effective integrative water research. Our research was conducted to enhance contemporary understanding of the strengths of implementing Indigenous and Western knowledge systems and to encourage readers to continue working towards a common goal of reconciliation and equality in all partnerships.

How community engagement in water and sanitation interventions impacts human health, infrastructure and service longevity in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review

“…However, the literature reveals mixed results of these interventions and initiatives -some display positive impacts, with others showing no impact on health (2,3). There is an expanding array of literature seeking to understand the contextual of WASH interventions and initiatives and their influence (4)(5)(6)(7).…”

“…Current literature shows multiple benefits of community engagement. Community engagement allows cultural exchange and the building of knowledge between the implementing partners (7). In addition, communities, (particularly indigenous communities), have developed knowledge structures by place, space and relationality over generations that are passed from one generation to the next, providing information on how to use resources sustainably (7).…”

“…Community engagement allows cultural exchange and the building of knowledge between the implementing partners (7). In addition, communities, (particularly indigenous communities), have developed knowledge structures by place, space and relationality over generations that are passed from one generation to the next, providing information on how to use resources sustainably (7). Limited literature is available on collaborative action in health interventions in LMICs, partly due to the difficulty to implement it (26).…”

22 reasons why collaborations fail: Lessons from water innovation research

“…In water research, systematic literature reviews have gained a reputation as a robust method for identifying, analysing, and synthesising large bodies of literature (Stefanelli et al, 2017). Whereas traditional literature reviews seldom justify what search or selection criteria they used, systematic literature reviews make this explicit to improve the transparency, accountability and reproducibility of the results -so that other researchers have a baseline from which to check and build upon in future studies (Porter et al, 2014).…”

Advancing Reconciliation? Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and Perspectives in the Mackenzie River Basin Transboundary Agreements

“…Brugnach and Ingram (2012) write that policy decisions have commonly been unfavourable to Indigenous communities because their interests do not fit with bigger policy agendas considered in most governmental discussions on resource management. Furthermore, Indigenous perspectives tend to not fit with the Western worldview and because of this, their views have gone "devalued" in resource management (Stefanelli et al, 2017). Incorporating these alternative ways of thinking acknowledges that there are other views of governance, besides that of the state that could have implications for how water will be managed.…”