2019
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experientially learning how to communicate science effectively: A case study on decoding science

Abstract: The need for science communication programs is matched with the need for program evaluation. This case study is an evaluation of the "Decoding Science" program (DSP) [Rodgers et al. (2018). Science Communication, 40(1), 3-32], a science communication training program, and examines key experientiallearning themes [Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning:Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall]. Specifically, we discuss the program's emphasis on learning that s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research on science communication training has mostly examined the character of programs and their effects (e.g., Luisi et al, 2019; Miller et al, 2009; Rakedzon & Baram-Tsabari, 2017; Rodgers et al, 2018). Other research has developed tools to assist training efforts (e.g., Baram-Tsabari & Lewenstein, 2013; Rakedzon et al, 2017; Rowland et al, 2018), while another line of work has explored what science communication researchers think scientists should learn in training (Besley & Tanner, 2011; Yuan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research on science communication training has mostly examined the character of programs and their effects (e.g., Luisi et al, 2019; Miller et al, 2009; Rakedzon & Baram-Tsabari, 2017; Rodgers et al, 2018). Other research has developed tools to assist training efforts (e.g., Baram-Tsabari & Lewenstein, 2013; Rakedzon et al, 2017; Rowland et al, 2018), while another line of work has explored what science communication researchers think scientists should learn in training (Besley & Tanner, 2011; Yuan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program consisted of four hands-on workshops (learning) each with a different communication goal; four rehearsal sessions with live coaching and individualized feedback (application); and a 3-minute science story captured in video form (product). The reader is referred to a detailed discussion of the program’s components and procedures (see Luisi et al, 2019; Rodgers et al, 2018).…”
Section: Scale Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this research project aims to help managers understand, in its very organizational context [9], the implications of the strategic role of leadership regarding collective knowledge creation processes and, consequently, the new kind of leadership required for the demanded enterprise transformation. This is the reason why our research project long-term goal is to design actionable transformational leadership programs based on the experiential learning basis [10] presented in this paper.…”
Section: Relevance and Novelty Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%